In Medias Res: A Resolution of Some False Dichotomies in Origins of Life Research

Donald Frohlich, Richard Austin Choate

Resumen


In this paper, we address some of the false dichotomies that pervade contemporary scientific and philosophical research about the origin of life. These dichotomies can be divided into two categories, the methodological and the conceptual. In the first case, we focus on providing an alternative to the problems and paradoxes which arise from trying to eliminate a definition of life from scientific research into life’s origins. In the second case, we illustrate how origin of life research is confined by the same conceptual paradigm which continues to plague the mind-body problem. Based on this analysis, we then offer some general criteria that a definition of life should meet.


Referencias


Chalmers D (1995) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3): 200-19.

Cleland C (2007) Life’s working definition: does it work? Astrobiology Magazine.

Cleland C (2012) Life without definitions. Synthese 185: 125-144.

Cleland C, Chyba C (2002) Defining life. Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere 32(4):387-93.

Churchland P (1981) Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 78: 67-90.

de Chardin T (1959) The phenomenon of man. Harper Collins, New York.

Dennett D (1991) Consciousness explained. Little, Brown and Co., Boston.

Jabr F (2013) Why life does not really exist. Scientific American. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/brainwaves/why-life-does-not-really-exist/.

K Ruiz-Mirazo, Moreno A (2011) The need for a universal definition of life in twenty-first-century biology. In Terzis G, Arp R (eds.) Information and living systems philosophical and scientific perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, 3-24.

Nicholson DJ (2013) Organisms ≠ machines. Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences 44(4 Pt B): 669-78.

Peirce CS (1878) Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. Popular Science Monthly, 13, 470-482.

Bury, R. G. (ed. and trans.), 1960, Plato: Timaeus, Critias, Cleitophon, Menexenus, Epistles, Cambridge, Mass.: Loeb Classical Library.

Gould, Stephen J., and Richard C. Lewontin. "The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme." Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 205 (1979): 581–98.

. Gilbert Ryle, The Concept of Mind (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949)

. Thomas Nagel, "What is it like to be a bat?" [From The Philosophical Review LXXXIII, 4 (October 1974): 435-50.

Chalmers D (1995) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3): 200-19

Vergauwen, R. Will Science and Consciousness Ever Meat? Complexity, Symmetry and Qualia.Symmetry 2010, 2, 1250-1269.


Texto completo:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24310/Metyper.2017.v0i18.4736

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.24310/Metyper.2017.v0i18.4736.44244424x

Métricas de artículo

Visitas Citas ( veces) Discutido ( veces) Guardado ( veces)
Lecturas del abstract: 0
Descargas del pdf: 9
- Crossref:
- Scopus:
- Wos:
- Twitter:
- Facebook:
- Reddit:
- ScienceSeeker:
- Research Blogging:
- Mendeley:
- CiteUlike:

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.

Servicio de Publicaciones y Divulgación
Vicerrectorado de Investigación y Transparencia
Universidad de Málaga
Bulevar Louis Pasteur, 30.
Campus de Teatinos.
CP: 29010. Malaga.

http://www.uma.es/servicio-publicaciones-y-divulgacion-cientifica

Atención al público:
Lunes a viernes de 9:00 a 14:00 horas.