Animal Artistic Agency in Performative Interspecies Art in the Twenty-First Century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/BoLArte.2019.v0i40.6126Resumen
Traditional aesthetic places non-human animals in nature and not in culture. Non-human animals are generally considered to be artless beings without any urge or capacity to create aesthetic objects. To the contrary, the ability and the need to produce art is perceived as one of the last thresholds of humanity. Nevertheless, in the last decades more and more contemporary artists involve living non-human animals in artistic productions. By doing so they declare some non-human animals to be co-authors of artworks and trust in their creative agency. But is it legitimate to take animal contributions to installations, sculptures, video works, or paintings seriously? Can non-human animals be aesthetic actors in their own right? The text focuses on interspecies artworks that only come into existence with the help of non-human animals. While it seems clear that the participating non-human animals display some form of agency, it is debatable if they can be called artists.
Descargas
Referencias
ALLAND, Alexander (1977), The Artistic Animal. An Inquiry in the Biological Roots of Art. New York: Anchor.
BARAD, Karen (2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
BELTING, Hans (2001), Bild-Anthropologie. Entwu?rfe fu?r eine Bildwissenschaft, Mu?nchen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846752210
BERGER, John (1980), Why Look at Animals. London: Pinguin Books.
DARWIN, Charles (1871), The Descent of Man in Relation to Sex, London: John Murray. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.24784
DELEUZE, Gilles (1998), Das ABC von Gilles Deleuze und Claire Parnet, http://www.langlab.wayne.edu/cstivale/d-g/dasabc-a-l.html vom 01.11.2014.
DELEUZE, Gilles /GUATTARI, Felix (1980), Mille Plateaux. Paris.
DEXTER, Emma (2005), Vitamin D: New Perspectives in Drawing, London / New York: Phaidon.
ENDLER, John A. (2012), „Bowerbirds, art and aesthetics. Are bowerbirds artists and do they have an aesthetic sense?“, Communicative and Integrative Biology, May 2012, 1; 5(3), p. 281–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.19481
GELL, Alfred (1998), Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory, London: Oxford University Press.
HERDER, Johann Gottfried (2002), Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit (1784), ed. by Wolfgang Pross, Vol. III/1, Mu?nchen/Wien: Hanser.
HEYMER, Kay (1991), „Kommentar zu den ‚Nachmalungen’ der Parallel Malaktion mit Schimpansen 1979“, in: RAINER, Arnulf, Primaten, Köln/Bielefeld: Karl Körber Verlag.
HIRSCHELD, Eugene (2008), Can animals create Art?, In: http://marxist-theory-of-art.blogspot.de/2008/11/can-animals-create-art.html (Date of access: 10-03-2019).
HÖRNER/ANTLFINGER (2015), weekly, In: http://www.h--a.org/drawings/weekly-2/ (Date of access: 10-03-2019).
JEVBRATT, Lisa Jevbratt / ROSEBUD (2009), Artistic Interspecies Collaboration. Fieldguide. In: http://jevbratt.com/writing/interspecies_field_guide.pdf. (Date of access: 10-03-2019).
KAPLAN, Gisela/ROBERS, Leslie J. (2007), „Elephants that Paint, Birds that make Music. Do Animals have an aesthetic sense?“, Cerebrum. Emerging Ideas in Brain and Science, New York: Dana Press, p. 137-150.
KOMAR, Vitaly/MELAMID, Alexander (2000), When Elephants Paint. The Quest of Two Russian Artists to Save the Elephants of Thailand, New York: Harper.
LATOUR, Bruno (2005), Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.
MACDONALD, Juliet (2014), „Alpha: The Figure in the Cage“, Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism (Minding Animals: Part II), n.p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/rela-2014-002-macd
MCHUGH, Susan (2001), „Video Dog Star: William Wegman, Aesthetic Agency, and the Animal in Art”, Society and Animals 9.3, p. 229-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853001753644390
MORRIS, Desmond (1962), The Biology of Art, London/New York: Methuen Knopf.
LEEB, Susanne (2007), Die Kunst der Anderen. Weltkunst und die anthropologische Konfiguration der Moderne, Frankfurt/Oder.
LENAIN, Thierry (1997), Monkey Painting, London: Reaktion Books.
MENNINGHAUS, Winfried (2011), Wozu Kunst? Ästhetik nach Darwin, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
PAULCKE, Wilhelm (1923), Steinzeitkunst und moderne Kunst, Stuttgart: Schweizerbart.
RAINER, Arnulf (2010), Schriften. Selbstzeugnisse und ausgewählte Interviews, Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz.
SWEENEY ART GALLERY (2009), Intelligent Design. Interspecies Art. In: http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~divola/PDF/PressRelease_Interspecies_Final.pdf (Date of access: 10-03-2019).
THOMAS, Nick (2007), „He Lets Creepy-Crawlies Get Their Feet Wet as Painters“, The Washington Post, 18.8.2007. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/17/AR2007081700603.html.
UEXKÜLL, von, Jakob Johann (1909), Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin.
WADIWEL, Dinesh (2015), The War Against Animals, Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004300422
WELSCH, Wolfgang (2004), Animal Aesthetics, http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=243 (Date of access: 10-03-2019).
Descargas
Publicado
Dimensions
Número
Sección
Licencia
Todos los contenidos publicados en la revista Boletín de Arte están sujetos a la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimento-NoComercia-Compartirigual 4.0 cuyo texto completo puede consultar en <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Los/as autores/as cuyas contribuciones sean aceptadas para su publicación en esta revista conservarán el derecho no exclusivo de utilizar sus contribuciones con fines académicos, de investigación y educativos, incluyendo el auto-archivo o depósito en repositorios de acceso abierto de cualquier tipo.
La edición electrónica de esta revista esta editada por la Editorial de la Universidad de Málaga (UmaEditorial), siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.
Cómo citar
4.png)
