Failure and limit experience. Methodological naturalism and skeptical crisis in Hume's Treatise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v28i3.15339Keywords:
Naturalism, Skepticism, Failure, Hume, SchaefferAbstract
What does it mean "to fail" for a methodological naturalist? Is he doomed to skepticism? And is it a failure? To answer these questions, (1) I analyze what is considered as "naturalism" in Hume, and then (2) I study the skeptical crisis narrated at the conclusion of Book I of the Treatise. I defend that the metaphors used there (which are historically linked to the concept of failure) allow two readings: one that necessarily link methodological naturalism and mitigated skepticism, and another that does not. However, I conclude that in both cases the same limit experience is drawn, allowing non-excepcionalist science and philosophy.
Downloads
Metrics
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
-
—
- Editor & editorial board
- profiles
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- Universidad de Málaga
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
References
CALVO DE SAAVEDRA, A. (2013). El carácter de la “verdadera filosofía” en David Hume. Colombia: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
DIÉGUEZ, A. (2014), "Delimitación y defensa del naturalismo metodológico (en la ciencia y en la filosofía), en R. Gutiérrez-Lombardo y J. Sanmartín (eds.) La filosofía desde la ciencia. México: Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano.
FOGELIN, R. (2009). Hume's skeptical crisis. A textual study. United States: Oxford University Press.
FOUCAULT, M (2001) Los Anormales: curso de Collège de France (1974-1975). Madrid: Akal.
HEIDEGGER, M. (1951). El ser y el tiempo. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
HUME, D. (1988). Tratado de la naturaleza humana. Madrid: Tecnos.
HUME, D. (2007). Investigación sobre el conocimiento humano. Investigación sobre los principios de la moral. Madrid: Tecnos.
HUSSERL, E. (1962). Ideas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
HUSSERL, E. (2008). La crisis de las ciencias europeas y la fenomenología trascendental. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
KEMP SMITH, N. (2005). The Philosophy of David Hume. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
MALL, R.A. (1975). Naturalism and criticism. New York: Springer.
MICHAUD, Y. (1983). Hume et la fin de la philosophie. Paris: Quadridge/PUF.
MOUNCE, H.O. (1999). Hume’s naturalism. London & New York: Routledge.
ROCCO, V. (Ed.). Glosario del fracaso. Madrid: Círculo de Bellas Artes. Recuperado el 6 de septiembre de 2022 en: https://www.circulobellasartes.com/glosarios/fracaso/
SCHAEFFER, J.M. (2009). El fin de la excepción humana. Barcelona: Marbot.
SCHAEFFER, J.M. (2020). Les troubles du récit. Vincennes: Thierry Marchaise.
STROUD, B. (1986). Hume. México: UNAM.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate free access to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public. All content published in Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, are subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license whose full text can be found at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions of the images that are subject to copyright.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal will retain the non-exclusive right to use their contributions for academic, research and educational purposes, including self-archiving or repository in open access repositories of any kind.
The electronic edition of this magazine is edited by the Editorial Service of the University of Malaga (Uma Editorial), being necessary to cite the origin in any partial or total reproduction.
5.png)
