Digital Capabilities, Family Involvement, and Competitive Performance: A Moderated Mediation Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.16.1.2026.21976Keywords:
AI capability, Competitive performance, Big data capability, Family firm, Family involvement, TunisiaAbstract
This study examines how Artificial Intelligence (AI) capability influences competitive performance in family firms through the mediating role of big data capability (BDC) and the moderating effect of family involvement in management. Drawing on survey data from 160 Tunisian family firms that adopted AI technologies between 2021 and 2025, the study employs covariance-based structural equation modeling with bootstrapping. The findings show that AI capability enhances competitive performance indirectly through the development of BDC. In addition, family involvement in management strengthens the positive relationship between AI capability and BDC, thereby amplifying the indirect effect to competitive performance. The results suggest that the performance benefits of AI are more likely to emerge when firms develop complementary data analytics capabilities and maintain strong family managerial involvement. By integrating insights from digital transformation and family business research, this study demonstrates that the business value of AI depends not only on technological capabilities but also on organizational and managerial complementarities that enable firms to transform digital investments into competitive advantage.
Downloads
References
Åberg, C., Calabrò, A., Valentino, A., & Torchia, M. (2024). Socioemotional wealth and family firm performance: The moderating role of CEO tenure and millennial CEOs. British Journal of Management, 35(4), 2103–2121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12818
Abou-Foul, M., Jose, L., Ruiz-Alba, J. L., & López-Tenorio, P. J. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence capabilities on servitization: The moderating role of absorptive capacity—A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113609
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation and work (NBER Working Paper No. 24196). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24196
Akter, S., Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2016). How to improve firm performance using big data analytics capability and business strategy alignment? International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.018
Alayo, M., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2022). Innovation and internationalization in family SMEs: Analyzing the role of family involvement. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(2), 454–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2020-0302
Aparicio, G., Ramos, E., Casillas, J.C., & Iturralde, T. (2021). Family business research in the last decade. A bibliometric review. European Journal of Family Business, 11(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v11i1.12503
Arzubiaga, U., Díaz-Moriana, V., Bauweraerts, J., & Escobar, O. (2021). Big data in family firms: A socioemotional wealth perspective. European Management Journal, 39(3), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.10.006
Atienza-Barba, M., Álvarez-García, J., Meseguer-Martínez, Á., & Barba-Sánchez, V. (2025). The family business in the digital era: Advancing towards artificial intelligence. Journal of Family Business Management, 15(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2024-0215
Belhadi, A., Mani, V., Kamble, S. S., Khan, S. A. R., & Verma, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: An empirical investigation. Annals of Operations Research, 333(2), 627–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-03956-x
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
Brinkerink, J., Rondi, E., Benedetti, C., & Arzubiaga, U. (2020). Family business or business family? Organizational identity elasticity and strategic responses to disruptive innovation. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 11(4), 100360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100360
Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421
Calabrò, A., Vecchiarini, M., Gast, J., Campopiano, G., De Massis, A., & Kraus, S. (2019). Innovation in family firms: A systematic literature review and guidance for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(3), 317–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12192
Chaudhuri, R., Chatterjee, S., Kraus, S., & Vrontis, D. (2023). Assessing the AI-CRM technology capability for sustaining family businesses in times of crisis: The moderating role of strategic intent. Journal of Family Business Management, 13(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-12-2021-0153
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Pearson, A. W., & Barnett, T. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00407.x
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402
Ciampi, F., Demi, S., Magrini, A., Marzi, G., & Papa, A. (2021). Exploring the impact of big data analytics capabilities on business model innovation: The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Research, 123, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.023
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P., & Lang, L. H. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00511
Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018414
Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
De Fano, D., Schena, R., & Russo, A. (2026). Harnessing AI ambidexterity for competitive advantage: The role of dynamic capabilities in digital innovation ecosystems. European Journal of Innovation Management, 29(2), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2024-1404
De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Wright, M. (2016). Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0017
De Massis, A., Sharma, P., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. J. (2012). Family business studies: An annotated bibliography. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2006). Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organization, 4(3), 215–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127006066596
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., ... & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Edwards, K. D., & Konold, T. R. (2020). Moderated mediation analysis: A review and application to school climate research. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 25. https://doi.org/10.7275/16436623
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Gafsi, R. (2026a). The role of artificial intelligence in Tunisian businesses' performance: Case of family firms. International Journal of Innovation, Digital Economy and Management Sciences (IJIDEMS), 1(1). Retrieved from https://journals.imist.ma/index.php/IJIDEMS/article/download/7578/4483
Gafsi, R. (2026b). Artificial intelligence capabilities, generational involvement, and competitive performance: Case of Tunisian family businesses. Journal of Global Business Insights, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.11.1.1358
Gafsi, R. (2024). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth in Tunisian family firms: The moderating role of generational involvement. In B. A. Krasniqi, S. Kraus, V. Ramadani, & P. Jones (Eds.), Entrepreneurial behaviour of family firms: Perspectives on emerging economies (pp. 59–85). Leeds, England: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-934-520241004
Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007
Gao, Y., Liu, S., & Yang, L. (2025). Artificial intelligence and innovation capability: A dynamic capabilities perspective. International Review of Economics & Finance, 92, 103923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103923
Ghasemaghaei, M., & Calic, G. (2020). Assessing the impact of big data on firm innovation performance: Big data is not always better data. Journal of Business Research, 108, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.062
Gilani, S. A. M., Copiaco, A., Gernal, L., Yasin, N., Nair, G., & Anwar, I. (2023). Savior or distraction for survival: Examining the applicability of machine learning for rural family farms in the United Arab Emirates. Sustainability, 15(4), 3720. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043720
Goertz, G. (2003). The substantive importance of necessary condition hypotheses. In G. Goertz & H. Starr (Eds.), Necessary conditions: Theory, methodology, and applications. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & de Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.593320
Gómez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Gupta, M., & George, J. F. (2016). Toward the development of a big data analytics capability. Information & Management, 53(8), 1049–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.07.004
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press
Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hernández-Linares, R., Kellermanns, F. W., López-Fernández, M. C., & Sarkar, S. (2020). The effect of socioemotional wealth on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and family business performance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 23(3), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420941438
Hossain, F., Ahmed, G. M. S., Shuvo, S. P. P., Kona, A. N., Raina, M. U. H., & Shikder, F. (2024). Unlocking artificial intelligence for strategic market development and business growth: Innovations, opportunities, and future directions. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 5825–5846. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.3263
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Kidwell, R. E., Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2018). Learning bad habits across generations: How negative imprints affect human resource management in the family firm. Human Resource Management Review, 28(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.05.002
Koulis, A., Kyriakopoulos, C., & Lakkas, I. (2025). Artificial intelligence and firm value: A bibliometric and systematic literature review. FinTech, 4(4), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech4040054
Kumar, D., & Ratten, V. (2025). Artificial intelligence and family businesses: A systematic literature review. Journal of Family Business Management, 15(2), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-08-2024-0160
Kumar, P., Sharma, S. K., & Dutot, V. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled CRM capability in healthcare: The impact on service innovation. International Journal of Information Management, 69, 102598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102598
Lannon, F., Lyons, R., & O'Connor, C. (2024). Generation AI and family business: A perspective article. Journal of Family Business Management, 14(3), 470–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-07-2023-0116
León, O., de la Fuente, D., Fernandez-Vazquez, S., & Puente, J. (2024). Big data analytics capabilities: Direct and mediating relationships with innovative and business performance. Journal of Management Analytics, 11(2), 182–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2024.2328522
López Muñoz, J. F., Safón, V., & Iborra, M. (2025). Digital alignment in family firms: The role of socioemotional wealth priorities and transformational leadership. European Journal of Family Business, 15(2), 246–269. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.15.2.2025.21836
Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9(3), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.275
Martin, J. A., Evert, R. E., & Payne, G. T. (2024). Nonfinancial outcomes in family business research: A review and future research agenda. Family Business Review, 37(1), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865231226141
Martínez-Alonso, R., Martínez-Romero, M. J., & Rojo-Ramírez, A. A. (2023). R&D collaboration breadth and family-firm innovation efficiency: The role of family management and generational stage. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(2), 677–695. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2023.18526
Martínez-Alonso, R., Martínez-Romero, M. J., & Rojo-Ramírez, A. A. (2020). Refining the influence of family involvement in management on firm performance: The mediating role of technological innovation efficiency. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 25(4), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420957330
Martínez-Romero, M. J., Diéguez-Soto, J., Molina-García, A., & Martínez-Alonso, R. (2025). Family firms, R&D outsourcing, competitiveness, and debt financing. Management Decision, 63(13), 657–685. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2024-1681
Martínez-Romero, M. J., & Rojo-Ramírez, A. A. (2016). SEW: Looking for a definition and controversial issues. European Journal of Family Business, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v6i1.5042
Mikalef, P., Islam, N., Parida, V., Singh, H., & Altwaijry, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) competencies for organizational performance: A B2B marketing capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research, 164, 113998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113998
Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information & Management, 58(3), 103434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103434
Mikalef, P., Fjørtoft, S. O., & Torvatn, H. Y. (2019). Developing an artificial intelligence capability: A theoretical framework for business value. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 5787–5796. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.698
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2014). Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4), 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12111
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19, 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00063.x
Muñoz-Bullón, F., Sanchez-Bueno, M. I., & Suárez-González, I. (2018). Diversification decisions among family firms: The role of family involvement and generational stage. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2017.11.001
Ndou, V., & Beqiri, M. (2014). Introduction for the special issue on big data. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis: Decision Support Systems and Services Evaluation, 5(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1285/i2037-3627v5n1p1
Oncioiu, I., Bunget, O. C., Türkeș, M. C., Căpușneanu, S., Topor, D. I., Tamaș, A. S., Rakoș, I. S., & Hint, M. Ș. (2019). The impact of big data analytics on company performance in supply chain management. Sustainability, 11(18), 4864. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184864
Pathak, S., Krishnaswamy, V., & Sharma, M. (2025). A dynamic capability perspective on the impact of big data analytics and enterprise architecture on innovation: An empirical study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 38(2), 532–563. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2024-0059
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Radu-Lefebvre, M., Davis, J. H., & Gartner, W. B. (2024). Legacy in family business: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Family Business Review, 37(1), 18–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865231224506
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
Raguseo, E. (2018). Big data technologies: An empirical investigation on their adoption, benefits and risks for companies. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.07.008
Sánchez-Peinado, E., & Escribá-Esteve, A. (2025). Crisis, culture, and community: Insights into family firms’ social actions during COVID-19. Journal of Family Business Management. ahead-of-print, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-01-2025-0021
Shamim, S., Zeng, J., Khan, Z., & Zia, N. U. (2020). Big data analytics capability and decision-making performance in emerging market firms: The role of contractual and relational governance mechanisms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120315
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3, Pt. 1), 461–488. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1833044
Sirmon, D. G., Arregle, J., Hitt, M. A., & Webb, J. W. (2008). The role of family influence in firms’ strategic responses to threat of imitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 979–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00267.x
Soluk, J., Miroshnychenko, I., & Nambisan, S. (2025). AI adoption in family firms: A mixed-methods study on the paradoxical roles of passive and active family involvement. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 43(1), 125–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12789
Soluk, J., & Kammerlander, N. (2023). Digitale Transformation und künstliche Intelligenz in Familienunternehmen. In T. Kollmann (Ed.), Handbuch digitale Wirtschaft. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17345-6_94-1
Soluk, J., & Kammerlander, N. (2021). Digital transformation in family-owned Mittelstand firms: A dynamic capabilities perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(6), 676–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1857666
Soluk, J., Miroshnychenko, I., Kammerlander, N., & De Massis, A. (2021). Family influence and digital business model innovation: The enabling role of dynamic capabilities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(4), 867–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721998946
Sivarajah, U., Kumar, S., Kumar, V., Chatterjee, S., & Li, J. (2024). A study on big data analytics and innovation: From technological and business cycle perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 202, 123328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123328
Srinivasan, R., Choo, A., Narayanan, S., Sarkar, S., & Tenhiälä, A. (2021). Knowledge sources, innovation objectives, and their impact on innovation performance: Quasi-replication of Leiponen and Helfat (2010). Strategic Management Journal, 42(11), 2104–2136. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3287
Teece, D. J. (2023). Big tech and strategic management: How management scholars can inform competition policy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2022.0013
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Tuncalp, D. (2025). Directing the future: Artificial intelligence integration in family businesses. Journal of Family Business Management, 15(2), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-03-2024-0051
Ulrich, P., Frank, V., & Buetner, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence in small and medium-sized family firms: An empirical study on the impact of family influence. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 7(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv7i1p7
Upadhyay, N., Upadhyay, S., Al-Debei, M. M., Baabdullah, A. M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). The influence of digital entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial orientation on intention of family businesses to adopt artificial intelligence: Examining the mediating role of business innovativeness. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 29(1), 80–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2022-0154
Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540. https://doi.org/10.2307/258786
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2020). Family ownership. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(2), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa007
Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Akter, S., Ren, S. J., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2016). Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 70, 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.009
Wang, N., Chen, B., Wang, L., Ma, Z., & Pan, S. (2024). Big data analytics capability and social innovation: The mediating role of knowledge exploration and exploitation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 864. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03288-8
Wang, G., Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W. T., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 176, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.014
Worek, M., & Aaltonen, P. (2025). AI adoption challenges in family-owned firms: A case study. In P. Aaltonen & E. Kurvinen (Eds.), Contemporary issues in Industry 5.0: Technology, work and globalization. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74779-3_9
Xie, W., Zhang, Q., Lin, Y., Wang, Z., & Li, Z. (2024). The effect of big data capability on organizational innovation: A resource orchestration perspective. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(6), 3767–3791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01208-w
Xu, M., Zhang, Y., Sun, H., & Tang, Y. (2024). How digital transformation enhances corporate innovation performance: The mediating roles of big data capabilities and organizational agility. Heliyon, 10, e34905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34905
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the author upon reasonable request.
Dimensions
Citations
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rim Gafsi
Copyright generates two different rights: moral rights and patrimonial rights that EJFB recognizes and respects. Moral rights are those relating to the recognition of the authorship. They are rights of a personal nature that are perpetual, inalienable, unseizable and imprescriptible as consequence of the indivisible union of the author and his/her work. Patrimonial rights are those that can be derived from the reproduction, distribution, adaptation or communication of the work, among others.
Authors who publish in EJFB retain the copyright of their work and grant the right of its first publication to the journal in open access. EJFB is authorized to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or communicate the work under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License. This means that you are free to share and adapt this work under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to its author(s), which implie the right to be reconognized and cited correctly.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
.png){kind=logo}
27.png)
