Test de Creatividad Figural – versión para adolescentes y adultos: investigación de la fiabilidad mediante diferentes métodos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/escpsi.18.1.2025.20111Palabras clave:
Confiabilidad, Cualidades psicométricas, Evaluación psicológicaResumen
La creatividad es una característica que ha sido valorada en diferentes contextos y considerada una de las habilidades esenciales en el siglo XXI. A pesar de este énfasis en el constructo, los instrumentos para su evaluación aún son escasos en Brasil. Ante este escenario, este artículo presenta los resultados de dos estudios orientados a investigar las cualidades psicométricas de un test en proceso de desarrollo: el Test de Creatividad Figural para adolescentes y adultos. En el estudio 1, se estimó la estabilidad temporal en una muestra compuesta por 179 participantes brasileños de 14 a 80 años. La correlación entre el test y el retest fue de r = .665. En el estudio 2, confiabilidad del evaluador, dos jueces evaluaron las respuestas de 97 participantes y la correlación fue de r = .88. Los resultados favorables motivan la continuación de los estudios hasta que el instrumento pueda estar disponible para uso profesional.
Descargas
Métricas
Publicación Facts
Perfil de revisores N/D
Información adicional autores
Indexado: {$indexList}
-
Indexado en
- Perfil de director y equipo editorial
- ##plugins.generic.pfl.profiles##
- Sociedad Académica/Grupo
- N/D
- Editora:
- UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
Para obtener más información sobre un dato, haga clic
##plugins.generic.pfl.maintainedByPKP##
Citas
Acar, S., Berthiaume, K., Grajzel, K., Dumas, D., Flemister, C. T., & Organisciak, P. (2023). Applying automated originality score to the verbal form of Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Gifted Child Quarterly, 67(1), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211061874
Acar, S., Branch, M. J., Burnett, C., & Cabra, J. F. (2021). Assessing the Universality of the Zero Originality Lists of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT)-Figural: An Examination with African American College Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(4), 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211012964
Acar, S., Lee, L. E., & Hodges, J. (2023). Assessing the Robustness of the Factor Structure of TTCT-Figural: A Meta-CFA Replication-Extension. Creativity Research Journal, 35(4), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2209393
Alabbasi, A. M. A., Paek, S. H., Kim, D., & Cramond, B. (2022). What do educators need to know about the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: a comprehensive view. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000385
Ambiel, R. A. M., & Carvalho, L. F. (2017). Validade e precisão de instrumentos de avaliação psicológica [Validity and reliability of psychological tests]. In M. R. C. Lins & J. C. Borsa (Orgs.), Avaliação psicológica: Aspectos teóricos e práticos [Psychological assessment: theoretial and practices aspects] (pp. 115-125). Vozes.
Anastasi, A. & Urbina, S. (2000). Testagem Psicológica [Psychological testing]. Artes Médicas.
Andrade, J.M. & Valentini, F. (2018). Diretrizes para a construção de testes psicológicos: a Resolução CFP n.009/2018 em destaque [Guidelines for the Construction of Psychological Tests: Regulation CFP No: 009/2018 in Highlight]. Psicologia Ciência e Profissão, 38 (n.spe.), 28-39. http://doi/org/10.1590/1982-3703000208890
Barbot, B., Hass, R. W., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2019). Creativity assessment in psychological research: (Re)setting the standards. The Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000233
Bart, W. M., Hokanson, B., & Can, I. (2017). An investigation of the factor structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational Sciences: theory and practice, 17(2), 515-528. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp/2017.2.0051
Barth, P., & Stadtmann, G. (2024). Creativity in the West and the East: A Meta-Analysis of Cross-Cultural Differences. Creativity Research Journal, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2024.2369442
Becker, M., & Cabeza, R. (2023). Assessing creativity independently of language: A language-independent remote associate task (LI-RAT). Behavior Research Methods, 55, 85–102. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01773-5
Berg, J., Vestena, C. L. B., & Costa-Lobo, C. (2020). Creativity in Brazilian education: review of a decade of literature. Creative Education, 11(3), 420-433. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.113030
Chu, T., & Lin, W. (2013). Uniqueness, integration, or separation? Exploring the nature of creativity through creative writing by elementary school students in Taiwan. International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 33(5), 582-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.821459
Cropley, D. H., Theurer, C., Mathijssen, A. C. S., & Marrone, R. L. (2024). Fit-For-Purpose Creativity Assessment: Automatic Scoring of the Test of Creative Thinking – Drawing Production (TCT-DP). Creativity Research Journal, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2024.2339667
De La Torre, S. (1991). Evaluacion de la creatividad. Editorial Escuela Española.
Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682
Green, A. E., Beaty, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., & Kaufman, J. C. (2023). The Process Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 36(3), 544–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2254573
Helfand, M., Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). The Four C Model of Creativity: Culture and context. In V. P. Glăveanu (Ed.), Palgrave handbook of creativity and culture research (pp. 15-360). Palgrave.
Jung, J. Y. (2022). Physical giftedness/talent: A systematic review of the literature on identification and development. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.961624
Kasirer, A., Adi-Japha, E., & Mashal, N. (2020). Verbal and figural creativity in children with autism spectrum disorder and Typical Development. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559238
Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_2
Kim, K. H. (2011). The APA 2009 division 10 debate: are the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking still relevant in the 21st century? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(4), 302-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021917
Krumm, G., Arán-Filippetti, V., & López, M. B. (2024). Evaluación de la creatividad: dos estudios normativos del Test de Pensamiento Creativo de Torrance (TTCT), Figuras, Formas A y B en niños argentinos. Psicogente 27(51), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.17081/psico.27.51.6419
Kupers, E., Lehmann-Wermser, A., McPherson, G., & van Geert, P. (2019). Children’s Creativity: A Theoretical Framework and Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 89(1), 93–124. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318815707
Lassig, C. (2019). Creativity talent development: fostering creativity in schools. In S.R. Smith (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 1-25). Springer.
Lee, L. E., Meyer, M. S., & Crutchfield, K. (2021). Gifted Classroom Environments and the Creative Process: A Systematic Review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(2), 107-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532211001450
Lee, L. E., Rinn, A. N., & Rambo-Hernandez, K. E. (2024). What Happens After Nomination? Evaluating the Probability of Gifted Identification with the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking. Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(2), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862231222886
Long, H., & Wang, J. (2022). Dissecting Reliability and Validity Evidence of Subjective Creativity Assessment: A Literature Review. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1399–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09679-0.
Lubart, T., Zenasni, F., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative potential and its measurement. International Journal form Talent Development and Creativity, 1(2), 41-50. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1301375.pdf
Nakano, T. C., & Wechsler, S. M. (2006). Teste Brasileiro de Criatividade Figural: proposta de instrumento [Brazilian test of figural creativity.: instrumental proposal] Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 103-110. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/284/28440111.pdf.
Nakano, T. C., & Wechsler, S. M. (2018). Creativity and innovation: Skills for the 21 Century. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 35(3), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982- 02752018000300002
Nakano, T. C., Batagin, L. R., Cano, I. W., & Fusaro, G. J. (2023). Teste de Criatividade Figural versão adolescentes e adultos: evidências de validade convergente [The Figural Creativity Test: Teen and Adult Version: Evaluation of the Converging Type’s Validity]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 69(3), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP69.3.01
Nakano, T. C., Fusaro, G. J., Cano, I. W., Batagin, L. R., & de Abreu, I. C. C. (2023). A influência da idade na cotação de originalidade em um teste de criatividade figural [The effect of age on originality quotations in a figural creativit test]. Revista Ibero-Americana de Criatividade e Inovação-RECRIAI, 4. https://recriai.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/92
Nakano, T. C., Primi, R., & Zaia, P. (2023). Revisão dos modelos de criatividade [Review of creativity models]. In Instituto Ayrton Senna, R. Primi, T. C. Nakano, K. McGrew, & J. Schneider (Orgs.), Educação no século XXI: inteligência, pensamento crítico e criatividade (pp. 185-291). Hogrefe e Instituto Ayrton Senna.
Nakano. T. C. (2018). A criatividade pode ser medida? Reflexões sobre métodos utilizados e questões envolvidas [Can creativity be measured? Reflections on methods used and issues involved]. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 70(1), 128-145). https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712018230313
Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The philosophical roots of Western and Eastern conceptions of creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 26(1–2), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0091265
Nunes, C. H. S. S., & Primi, R. (2010). Aspectos técnicos e conceituais da ficha de avaliação dos testes psicológicos [Technical and conceptual aspects of the psychological test evaluation form]. In Conselho Federal de Psicologia (CFP), Avaliação Psicológica: diretrizes na regulamentação da profissão (pp. 101-128). CFP.
O’Tolle, K., & Horvát, E. (2024). Extending human creativity with AI. Journal of Creativity, 34(2), 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2024.100080
Oliveira, K. S., Nakano, T. C., & Wechsler, S. M. (2016). Criatividade e saúde mental: uma revisão da produção científica na última década [Creativity and Mental Health: A Review of Scientifi c Production in the Last Decade]. Temas em Psicologia, 24(4), 1493-1506. http://doi.org/10.9788/TP2016.4-16
Patterson, J. D., Merseal, H. M., Johnson, D. R., Agnoli, S., Baas, M., Baker, B. S., Barbot, B., Benedek, M., Borhani, K., Chen, Q., Christensen, J. F., Corazza, G. E., Forthmann, B., Karwowski, M., Kazemian, N., Kreisberg-Nitzav, A., Kenett, Y. N., Link, A., Lubart, T.,… Beaty, R. E. (2023). Multilingual semantic distance: Automatic verbal creativity assessment in many languages. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 17(4), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000618
Peixoto, E. M., & Ferreira-Rodrigues, C. F. (2019). Propriedades psicométricas dos testes psicológicos [Psychometrics Properties of psychological tests]. In M. N. Baptista et al. (Orgs.), Compêndio de avaliação psicológica (pp. 29-39). Vozes.
Plucker, J. A. (2022). The Patient is Thriving! Current Issues, Recent Advances, and Future Directions in Creativity Assessment. Creativity Research Journal, 35(3), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2110415
Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: from potential to realization (pp. 153-167). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-009
Plucker, J. A., Guo, J., & Makel, M. C. (2018). Creativity. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (2nd ed., pp. 81-99). Springer.
Puccio, G. J., & Murdock, M. C. (1999). Creativity assessment: Readings and resources. Creative Education Foundation Press.
Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness: A Developmental Model for Promoting Creative Productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246–279). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.015
Renzulli, J. S. (2016). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In S. M. Reis (Ed.), Reflections on gifted education (pp. 55–86). Prufrock Press.
Revelle, W., & Condon, D. M. (2019). Reliability from α to ω: A tutorial. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1395–1411. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000754
Rocha, K. N. & Wechsler, S. M. (2018). A avaliação da criatividade nas organizações: estudo comparativo entre técnicas usuais e estandardizadas de avaliação psicológica [The Evaluation of Creativity in Organizations: Comparative Study of Usual and Standardized Psychological Evaluation Techniques]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluacion – e Avaliação Psicológica, 48(3), 139-149. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4596/459657523013/
Runco, M. A. (2023). Updating the Standard Definition of Creativity to Account for the Artificial Creativity of AI. Creativity Research Journal, 37(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977
Runco, M.A. (2016). We must prepare for the unforeseeable future. In D. Ambrose & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Creative intelligence in the 21st century: grappling with enormous problems and huge opportunities (pp. 65-73). Sense Publishers.
Sánchez-Meca, J., López-Pina, J. A., & López-López, J. A. (2008). A review of the meta-analytic studies of reliability generalization. Escritos de Psicologia, 2(1), 110-121. https://revistas.uma.es/index.php/espsi/article/view/13365/13660
Sato, D. T. B., & Seabra A., G. (2022). Avaliação na Neuropsicopedagogia clínica [Assessment in Clinical Neuropsychology]. Wak Editora.
Sierra, M. D. V., Cervantes, C. J. R., Verche, E., & Espinoza, B. V. P. (2024). Creativity and Decision Making in Giftedness. Education Sciences, 14(3), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030251
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). The triarchic theory of intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 92–104). The Guilford Press.
Sternberg, R. J., Glăveanu, V., & Kaufman, J. C. (2022). In Quest of Creativity: Three Paths toward an Elusive Grail. Creativity Research Journal, 36(1), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2107299
Sternberg, R.J. (2005). The WICS model of giftdness. In R. J. Stenberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftdeness (pp. 243-327). Cambridge University Press.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R. Sternberg, y J. David- son, J. (Eds.). Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 21-52). Cambridge University Press.
Terai, H., Miwa, K., & Mizuno, S. (2024). Stability of Assessment Using Creativity-Related Indices. Japanese Psychological Research, 1-14. http://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12519
Treffinger, D. J. (1995). School development, talent development, and creativity. Roeper Review, 18, 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199509553707
Treffinger, D. J., Schoonover, P. F., & Selby, E. C. (2013). Educating for creativity & innovation. Prufrock.
Xu, S., Reiss, M. J., & Lodge, W. (2024). Comprehensive Scientific Creativity Assessment (C-SCA): A New Approach for Measuring Scientific Creativity in Secondary School Students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10469-z
Yahn, L., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Asking the wrong question: Why shouldn’t people dislike creativity? In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Creative intelligence in the 21st century: Grappling with enormous problems and huge opportunities (pp. 75-87). Sense.
Zhu, W., Shang, S., Jiang, W., Pei, M., & Su, Y. (2019). Convergent thinking moderates the relationship between divergent thinking and scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 320-328. http://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641685
Ziegler, A. (2009). Research on giftedness in the 21st century. In L.V. Shavinina (Ed.), International Handbook on Giftedness (pp.1509-1524). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-228
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Tatiana de Cassia Nakano
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Todos los contenidos publicados en Escritos de Psicología están sujetos a la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimento-NoComercia-Compartirigual 4.0 cuyo texto completo puede consultar en <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que:
- Se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra).
- No se usen para fines comerciales.
- Se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
Los derechos de autor son de dos clases: morales y patrimoniales. Los derechos morales son prerrogativas perpetuas, irrenunciables, intransferibles, inalienables, inembargables e imprescriptibles. De acuerdo con la legislación de derechos de autor, Escritos de Psicología reconoce y respeta el derecho moral de los autores/as, así como la titularidad del derecho patrimonial. Los derechos patrimoniales, se refieren a los beneficios que se obtienen por el uso o divulgación de las obras. Escritos de Psicología se publica en open access y queda autorizada en exclusiva para realizar u autorizar por cualquier medio el uso, distribución, divulgación, reproducción, adaptación, traducción o transformación de la obra.
Es responsabilidad de los autores/as obtener los permisos necesarios de las imágenes que están sujetas a derechos de autor.
10.png)
ESCRITOS DE PSICOLOGÍA-PSYCHOLOGICAL WRITINGS por 