Framing the Woman Photographer: On-Screen Representation and Legitimation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/fotocinema.33.2026.24215Keywords:
fotógrafas; cine; representación; cultura visualAbstract
The cinematographic representation of women photographers is a subject of study that has barely been explored within visual and cinematographic studies, despite the growing attention that cinema has given to the figure of the photographer. As opposed to broad or descriptive approaches, this article suggests an audiovisual, historical and cultural analysis that focuses on the cinematographic construction of the woman photographer as a subject of the gaze. The main objective is to analyse how cinema has depicted female visual authority and how such depiction has evolved from models of subalternity, sentimentalisation and sexualisation towards contemporary forms of professional legitimation.
Using a methodology based on audiovisual analysis, the gender perspective and visual culture studies, we have studied five films that were produced in different historical contexts: No Time for Love (Mitchell Leisen, 1943); Over-Exposed (Lewis Seiler, 1956); Girlfriends (Claudia Weill, 1978); Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus (Steven Shainberg, 2006); and Lee (Ellen Kuras, 2023).
Downloads
References
Azoulay, A. (2008). The civil contract of photography. Zone Books.
Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. Penguin.
Cadava, E. (1997). Words of light: Theses on the photography of history. Princeton University Press.
Campany, D. (2008). Photography and cinema. Reaktion Books.
Campany, D. (2008). From ecstasy to agony: The fashion shoot in cinema. Aperture, 190, 40–47.
Castillo, A. M., & Parejo, N. (2010). Las flores de Harrison. Fotoperiodistas en conflictos armados. En J. M. Pestano Rodríguez, S. Toledano Buendía, A. I. Ardèvol Abreu & C. E. Hernández Rodríguez (Coords.), La comunicación social en estado crítico. Entre el mercado y la comunicación para la libertad: Actas del II Congreso Internacional Latina de Comunicación Social. Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social.
Church Gibson, P. (2006). Peeping Tom and the scopic drive. En P. Church Gibson (Ed.), Fashion and celebrity culture (pp. 101–116). Berg.
De las Heras, B. (2014). El fotógrafo como testigo de la historia. Ocho y Medio.
De las Heras, B. (2024). La fotografía como arqueología de la historia contemporánea: De instante eterno a fuente de memoria. Fotocinema. Revista Científica de Cine y Fotografía, (28), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.24310/fotocinema.28.2024.17654
De las Heras, B., Carballeda, M., & Pérez, J. P. (2022). Fotografía y cine: La construcción del recuerdo desde la imagen. Ediciones Fragua.
De Lauretis, T. (1987). Technologies of gender. Indiana University Press.
De Perthuis, K. (2012). Film stars as fashion icons. En P. Church Gibson (Ed.), Fashion and celebrity culture (pp. 47–66). Berg.
Doane, M. A. (1991). Femmes fatales: Feminism, film theory, psychoanalysis. Routledge.
Dunn, M. (2002). Where are all the women? Feminist Media Studies, 2(1), 136–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/146807702753745400
Esparza, R., & Parejo, N. (Coords.). (2011). Solos ante la cámara: Biopics de fotógrafos y cineastas. Luces de Gálibo.
Flores Martínez, M. J. (2013). La fotografía de moda en el cine: Funny Face y Blow Up. Fotocinema. Revista Científica de Cine y Fotografía, (7), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.24310/Fotocinema.2013.v0i7.5927
Ledo, M. (2005). Cine de fotógrafos. Gustavo Gili.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2009). Teoría de la imagen. Akal.
Modleski, T. (1988). The master's dollhouse: Rear Window. En The women who knew too much: Hitchcock and feminist theory (pp. 73–86). Methuen.
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6
Mulvey, L. (2006). Death 24x a second: Stillness and the moving image. Reaktion Books.
Ortegosa, M. (2000). A fotografia no cinema noir: uma relação entre-imagens. Significação: Revista de Cultura Audiovisual, (14), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-7114.sig.2000.90626
Parejo, N. (2009). La mirada del reportero de guerra en el cine. En Actas del I Congreso Internacional Latina de Comunicación Social (pp. 74–101).
Parejo, N. (2011). El fotógrafo en el cine. Re[presentaciones]. Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social.
Parejo, N. (2020). La fotografía en el cine de Pedro Almodóvar. Discursos Fotográficos, 16(29), 44–65.
Parejo, N. (2022). Los fotógrafos y el acto fotográfico en la filmografía de Pedro Almodóvar. Cuadernos.info, (52), 44–63.
Pisters, P. (2007). The photographer as detective in Blow-Up. Film-Philosophy, 11(3), 1–24.
Singh, J., & Grizzle, A. (2021). The e-ARTISTS media and information literacy model for managing access to quality information. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology.
Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Sorolla Romero, T. (2022). Desconfiar de la fotografía: Amnesia y retratos engañosos en los mind-game films. Fotocinema. Revista Científica de Cine y Fotografía, (25), 259–289. https://doi.org/10.24310/Fotocinema.2022.vi25.14497
Tecucianu, D. (2014). The language of cinema: Film, grammar and visual literacy. International Journal of Communication Research, 4, 252–256.
Vega, C. (2002). Reflexiones para una nueva historia de la fotografía. En J. Fontcuberta (Ed.), Fotografía: Crisis de la historia (pp. 210–219). Actar.
Vidal, M. (2000). Fotografía y cine: Un viaje de ida y vuelta. Exit, (3), 108–115.
Vygotsky, L. (2006). Psicología del arte. Paidós.
White, H. (1988). Historiography and historiophoty. The American Historical Review, 93(5), 1193–1199. https://doi.org/10.2307/1863524
Wilhelm, J. D. (2002). Action strategies for deepening comprehension: Using drama strategies to improve reading performance. Scholastic.
Williams, L. (1984). When the woman looks. En M. A. Doane, P. Mellencamp & L. Williams (Eds.), Re-vision: Essays in feminist film criticism (pp. 83–99). University Publications of America.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-07-15 (2)
- 2026-07-13 (1)
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Beatriz de las Heras Herrero
All contents published in Fotocinema Revista científica de cine y fotografía are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Fotocinema. Revista científica de cine y fotografía recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights, which will be transferred to University of Malaga in open access. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Fotocinema. Revista científica de cine y fotografía is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.




