Could Kant Shed Light on the Ontological Indeterminacy in Quantum Theory?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/nyl.19.2025.21210

Keywords:

Kant, Quantum theory, analogical schematism, extra-emirical concepts

Abstract

Quantum theory, particularly with its concepts of indeterminacy and superposition, demands of philosophers of science a profound review and a complete redefinition of the foundation of the notion of representation. This review has significant implications for assessing the Kantian heritage, especially for those among us who recognize the advances of the transcendental approach over realist and empiricist perspectives in epistemology. Kant endeavored to establish a foundation for the notion of representation consistent with the physics of his time. Today, as inheritors of Kant’s legacy in the philosophy of science, we face the challenge of establishing a new foundation for the idea of representation that aligns with the principles of contemporary science. In his Progress of Metaphysics, as well as in Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, Kant distinguishes between analogical (symbolic) schematism and real (transcendental) schematism. My aim in this work is to explore the notion of analogical schematism for evaluating the content of extra-empirical concepts in contemporary physical theories, where intuition proves to be intrinsically indeterminate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beckenkamp, J. (2023): Analogia e Simbolização em Kant. São Paulo, Dialética. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48021/978-65-270-0047-1

Bitbol, M. (2010): «Reflective Metaphysics: Understanding Quantum Mechanics from a Kantian Standpoint», Philosophica, (83), pp. 53-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82161

Bohr, N. (1958): Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. New York: J. Wiley and Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1934707

Born, M. and Einstein, A. (1971): The Born-Einstein Letters: Correspondence between Albert Einstein and Max and Hedwig Born from 1916 to 1955 with Commentaries by Max Born. Translated by Irene Born. New York: Walker and Company.

de Broglie, L. (1924): «A tentative theory of light quanta», The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 47(278), pp. 446–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786442408634378

Dirac, P. (1958): The Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Feynman, R., Leighton, R. and Sands, M. (1965): The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. 3. New York: Addison-Wesley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1972241

Heisenberg, W. (1927): «Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik», Zeitschrift für Physik, (43), pp. 172–198. (English translation in Wheeler and Zurek (eds.), Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983, pp. 62–84). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397280

Heisenberg, W. (1958): «The Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Theory», in Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 54-58.

Hermann, G. (2016): «Natural-Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics», in E. Crull and G. Bacciagaluppi (eds.), Grete Hermann – Between Physics and Phi-losophy- Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0970-3_15

Kant, I. (1996): «Religion within the boundaries of mere reason», in A. Wood and G. Giovanni. (transl. and eds.) Religion and Rational Theology. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press. (RGV, AA 06)

Kant, I. (1998): Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (KrV, A/B) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804649

Kant, I. (2000): Critique of the Power of Judgment, translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (KU, AA 05) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804656

Kant, I. (2002): «What real progress has metaphysics made in Germany since the time of Leibniz and Wolff? (1793/1804)», trans. Peter Heath, in H. Allison and P. Heath (eds.), Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, Cambridge, Cambridge Uni-versity Press. (FM, AA 20).

Kant, I. (2002): «Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (1786)», trans. M. Friedman, in H. Allison and P. Heath (eds.), Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, pp. 171-270. (MAN, AA 04) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498015.004

Kauark-Leite, P. (2012): Théorie quantique et philosophie transcendantale: dialogues possibles. Paris: Hermann.

Lebrun, G. (1970): Kant et la fin de la métaphysique : essai sur la «Critique de la faculté de juger ». Paris: Armand Colin. (Portuguese translation, Kant e o fim da metafísica, trad. C.A.R. de Moura, 2a ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002).

Loparic, Z. (2000): «Simbolização e esquematismo analógico», in A semântica transcendental de Kant. Campinas, CLE-UNICAMP.

von Neumann, J. (1955): Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-12

Dimensions

PlumX

Issue

Section

Miscellaneous Papers

How to Cite

Could Kant Shed Light on the Ontological Indeterminacy in Quantum Theory?. (2025). Nature & Freedom. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 19, 107-127. https://doi.org/10.24310/nyl.19.2025.21210