A bioethical context of integral ecology
Ten years after Laudato Si´
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/nyl.20.2026.21907Keywords:
Bioethics, Ecology, Laudato Si', global strategies, United Nations, human developmentAbstract
The encyclical Laudato Si' was signed in 2015, the same year in which the United Nations had set a deadline for the Millennium Development Goals. Comments are made from a bioethical perspective, highlighting its guiding role in helping to make these goals viable through changes in attitudes and behaviors. The origin and timeliness of these goals and their successors are questioned. The suggestions contained in Laudato Si' suggest that, in addition to environmental ecology, human ecology should also be considered as a more pressing imperative for the world. Laudato Si' contains several elements for understanding and bringing to life the interrelationship between human beings and the environment, without neglecting natural law and the common good. But macroeconomic indices that are less economistic in nature and more focused on human development and its capabilities must also be considered. It is necessary to adequately grasp the scale of the problems and offer guidelines for action that are not only possible, but above all appropriate, in line with ethics, true human rights, and a forward-looking vision that takes future generations into account.
Downloads
References
Adebola-Solarin, S., Gil-Alana, LA., Hernández-Herrera, M. (2024): «Persistence of hu-man capital development in OECD countries over 150 years: evidence from linear and nonlinear fractional integration methods». Economic Systems, 48 (3): 101215. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2024.101215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2024.101215
Ayllón, JR. (2019): El mundo de las ideologías. Madrid: Homo Legens.
Bastart, J., Rohmer, O., Popa-Roch, MA. (2021): «Legitimating discrimination against students with disability in school: The role of justifications of discriminatory behavior». International Review of Social Psychology, 34(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.5334/irsp.357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.357
Benedicto XVI [en línea]: Discurso ante el Bundestag (2011), https://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/es/speeches/2011/september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20110922_reichstag-berlin.html [Consultado 21/04/2025].
Blas-Lahitte, H., Sánchez-Vázquez, MJ. (2011): «Aportes para una Bioética medioambiental y la cohabitabilidad humana desde una visión relacional». pers.bioét, 15 (1):40-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2011.15.1.3
Camacho, L. (2015). «Sustainable Development Goals: kinds, connections and expectations». Journal of Global Ethics, 11(1):18-23. DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2015.1010097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2015.1010097
Cardona-Lozada, D. (2014): «Mujeres y anticonceptivos: ¿liberación femenina?» pers.bioét, 18(1):12-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2014.18.1.1
Carrasco-Aldunate, P., Rubio-Acuña, M., Fuentes-Olavarría, D. (2012): «Consentimiento informado: un pilar de la investigación clínica». Aquichán, 12 (1): 32-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2012.12.1.3
Chang, H. (2022): Realism for Realistic People. Cambridge: Cambridge University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635738
Comisión de las Comunidades europeas [en línea]: «Más allá del PIB. Evaluación del Progreso de un mundo cambiante»(2009), http://ec.europa.eu/environment/beyond_gdp/index_en.html [Consultado 21/04/2025].
Dafermos, Y., Monserand , A., Nikolaidi, M. (2022): Green Public Investment, Con-sumption Patterns and the Ecological Transition: A Macroeconomic Analysis. SSRN, 4097746: 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4097746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4097746
Dorffel, C., Schuhmann, S. (2022): «¿What Is Inclusive Development? Introducing the Multidimensional Inclusiveness Index». Social Indicators Research, 162: 1117-1148. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-021-02860-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02860-y
Duncan, OD. (1957): «Population Distribution and Community Structure». Cold Spring Harb Symp, Quant Biol 1957 22: 357-371; doi:10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.033
Fitoussi, JP, Stiglitz J. (2013): «On the Measurement of Social Progress and Wellbeing: Some Further», Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2011-19, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE). https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12072
Gamboa-Bernal G. (2024): «Bioética y Biojurídica: vías para reconciliar integralmente al ser humano». Ius Humani. Revista De Derecho,13(2): 291-327. DOI: 10.31207/ih.v13i2.349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31207/ih.v13i2.349
González, AM. (2006): Claves de Ley natural. Madrid: Rialp.
Juan Pablo II (1991): Sollicitudo Rei Socialis. Ciudad del Vaticano: Editrice Vaticana.
Leff E. (2012): «Límites y desafíos de la dominación hegemónica. La geopolítica de la biodiversidad y el desarrollo sustentable: economización del mundo, racionalidad ambiental y reapropiación social de la naturaleza», en Ceceña AE y Sader E. (comps.): La Guerra infinita. Hegemonía y terror mundial. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, pp. 191-216.
Leonard, A. (2010): La historia de las cosas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
McCombs, M. (2013): Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Malden: John Wiley & Sons.
Mladjan, MM., Marković, DZ. (2021): «Generational responsibility in consumption as a response to global economic crises». Sustainability, 13(6): 3329. DOI: 10.3390/su13063329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063329
Murphy, RP., Boyce, CJ., Dolan, P, et al. (2023): «Do misconceptions about health-related quality of life affect general population valuations of health states?» Value in Health, 26(5): 750-759. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.10.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2022.10.009
ONU [en línea]: «Agenda 2030», (2015), http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/2015/09/la-asamblea-general-adopta-la-agenda-2030-para-el-desarrollo-sostenible/ [Consultado: 13/03/2025].
ONU [en línea]: «Documento final del acto especial de seguimiento de la labor realizada para lograr los Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio», (2013), http://www.un.org/es/comun/docs/?symbol=A/68/L.4 [Consultado: 12/03/2025].
ONU [en línea]: «Ki-Moon B. Report of the UN Secretary-General: A Life of Dignity for All» (2013), http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/SG_Report_MDG_EN.pdf [Consultado: 12/03/2025].
ONU [en línea]: «Río+20 es la oportunidad de fomentar el desarrollo sostenible», (2012), https://www.un.org/es/desa/rio-20-es-la-oportunidad-para-implementar-el-desarrollo-sostenible [Consultado 19/04/2025].
ONU [en línea]:: «La importancia de los Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio». https://www.un.org/es/chronicle/article/la-importancia-de-los-objetivos-de-desarrollo-del-milenio-el-liderazgo-de-las-naciones-unidas-en-el [Consultado: 12/03/2025].
ONU Global Compact. [en línea]: «Los Diez Principios del Pacto Mundial», (2024), https://www.pactomundial.org/que-puedes-hacer-tu/diez-principios/ [Consultado 21/04/2025].
ONU. [en línea]: «Informe de síntesis del Secretario General sobre la agenda de desarrollo sostenible después de 2015, 33. A/69/700», (2015), http://www.un.org/es/comun/docs/?symbol=A/69/700 [Consultado: 07/03/2025].
ONU. [en línea]: «Informe de síntesis del Secretario General sobre la agenda de desarrollo sostenible después de 2015, 66. A/69/700», (2015), http://www.un.org/es/comun/docs/?symbol=A/69/700 [Consultado: 07/03/2025].
ONU. [en línea]: «Ki- moon B. Palabras del Secretario de la ONU en la Asamblea General del 25 de septiembre de 2015», (2015), http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/2015/09/palabras-del-secretario-general-en-la-cumbre-para-la-aprobacion-de-la-agenda-para-el-desarrollo-despues-de-2015/. [Consultado: 07/03/2025].
ONU. [en línea]: «Resolutions of the 79th Session», (2024), https://www.un.org/en/ga/79/resolutions.shtml [Consultado 07/03/2025].
ONU. [en línea]: «The future we want. A/RES/66/288», (2012), https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/734344?ln=en&v=pdf [Consultado: 07/03/2025].
ONU. [en línea]: «The Pact for the Future», (2024), https://docs.un.org/es/A/RES/79/1 [Consultado 07/03/2025].
Palazzi, P., Lauri, A. (1998): «The Human Development Index: suggested corrections». PSKL Quarterly Reviw, 51: 193-221.
Palumbi, SR, et al. (2001): «Humans as the world's greatest destruction, water evolutionary force». Science, 293: 1786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.293.5536.1786
Peeters, M. (2011): Marion-ética: los «expertos» de la ONU imponen su ley. Madrid: Rialp.
Rhonheimer, M. (2000): La perspectiva de la moral. Fundamentos de la Ética Filosófica. Madrid: Rialp.
Rodríguez-Sedano, A., Aguilera, JC. (2011): «La intersubjetividad a la luz de la apertura íntima personal». Studia Poliana, 13: 31-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/013.2126
SS Francisco. (2015): Carta Encíclica Laudato Si´. Ciudad del Vaticano: Editrice Vaticana.
SS Francisco. [en línea]: «Discurso ante el Congreso de los EE.UU. 24 de septiembre de 2015», 2015), https://www.aciprensa.com/ebooks/PapaenEstadosUnidos.pdf. [Consultado: 07/03/2025].
SS Francisco. [en línea]: «Discurso ante la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas. 25 de septiembre de 2015», (2015), https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/es/speeches/2015/september/documents/papa-francesco_20150925_onu-visita.html [Consultado: 07/03/2025].
SS. Francisco. (2023): Exhortac. Apostól. Laudate Deum. Ciudad del Vaticano: Editrice Vaticana.
Stiglitz J, Sen A, Fituossi I. [en línea]: «Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress», (2009), https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/8131721/8131772/Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi-Commission-report.pdf [Consultado 21/04/2025].
Stiglitz, J. [en línea]: «On the Wrong Side of Globalization». The New York Times. 15 Mar 2014, (2014), http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/15/on-the-wrong-side-of-globalization/?src=xps [Consultado: 2025 Abr 19].
Thoughts. Global Policy, 4 (3): 290-293 DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12072
Tomás de Aquino (2009): Suma Teológica. II-II q. 57-79. Madrid: BAC.
UN Environment Program. [en línea]: «Inclusive Wealth Report 2023: Measuring Sustainability and Equity», (2023), https://www.unep.org/resources/report/inclusive-wealth-report-2023-measuring-sustainability-and-equity, [Consultado 21/04/2025].
Watson, R. (1983): «A critique of Anti-anthropocentric Biocentrism». Environmental Ethics, 5: 245-256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19835325
Downloads
Published
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nature & Freedom. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal, accept the following terms:
1. Copyright and licensing information are clearly described on the journal’s web site: all content published in Naturaleza y Libertad is open acces without limit, and are subject to the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. The full text of which can be consulted at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
2. It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions for the images that are subject to copyright. The authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal will retain the non-exclusive right to use their contributions for academic, research and educational purposes, including self-archiving or deposit in open access repositories of any kind. The electronic edition of this magazine is edited by the Editorial de la University of Malaga (UmaEditorial), being necessary to cite the origin in any partial or total reproduction.
3. This journal allows and encourages authors to publish papers on their personal websites or in institutional repositories, both before and after their publication in this journal, as long as they provide bibliographic information that accredits, if applicable, your posting on it.
4. In no case will anonymous papers be published.
18.png)











