This is an outdated version published on 2026-03-31. Read the most recent version.

Effects of a teaching intervention on the intention to be physically active in students of the Physical Conditioning Vocational Training programme

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/riccafd.15.1.2026.22250

Keywords:

basic psychological needs, motivation, vocational sport training, self-determined, quasi-experimental design

Abstract

The present study examined the effects of a teaching intervention aimed at enhancing the motivational climate with respect to the satisfaction of basic psychological needs, motivation, self-esteem, and the intention to engage in future physical activity among first-year students enrolled in the Advanced Vocational Training Programme in Physical Conditioning. A quasi-experimental design was adopted, involving a control group (n = 18) and an experimental group (n = 14), with pretest and posttest assessments. The four-week intervention incorporated specific strategies to foster autonomy, competence, relatedness, and novelty. The results revealed a statistically significant difference in favour of the experimental group for the variable intention to be physically active. No significant differences were observed in the remaining variables, although positive trends emerged in the experimental group, particularly in perceived novelty and certain aspects of motivation. These findings support the educational potential of systematically applying motivational strategies grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and suggest that extending the duration and scope of such interventions may be necessary to fully evaluate their impact.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ministerio de Educación, Formación Profesional y Deportes. Datos y cifras. Curso escolar 2024-2025 [Internet]. 2024. Disponible en: https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/servicios-al-ciudadano/estadisticas/indicadores/datos-cifras.html

2. European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. The future of vocational education and training in Europe: synthesis report. [Internet]. LU: Publications Office; 2023 [citado 6 de mayo de 2025]. Disponible en: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/08824

3. OECD. Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators [Internet]. OECD; 2023. (Education at a Glance). Disponible en: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/education-at-a-glance-2023_e13bef63-en.html doi:10.1787/e13bef63-en

4. Petnuchova J, Hrmo R, Hornakova V, Podaril M, Stur M, Ridzonova Z, et al. Vocational education and training in OECD countries. En: 2012 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL). Villach: IEEE; 2012. p. 1-6. doi:10.1109/ICL.2012.6402131

5. Martínez-Morales I, Marhuenda-Fluixá F. Vocational education and training in Spain: steady improvement and increasing value. J Vocat Educ Train. 2020;72(2):209-27. doi:10.1080/13636820.2020.1729840

6. Martín Artiles A, Lope A, Barrientos D, Moles B, Carrasquer P. The rhetoric of Europeanisation of dual vocational education and training in Spain. Transf Eur Rev Labour Res. 2020;26(1):73-90. doi:10.1177/1024258919896901

7. Sureda-García I, Jiménez-López R, Álvarez-García O, Quintana-Murci E. Emotional and behavioural engagement among Spanish students in vocational education and training. Sustainability. 2021;13(7):3882. doi:10.3390/su13073882

8. Expósito-López J, Romero-Díaz de la Guardia JJ, Olmedo-Moreno EM, Pistón Rodríguez MD, Chacón-Cuberos R. Adaptation of the educational motivation scale into a short form with multigroup analysis in a vocational training and baccalaureate setting. Front Psychol. 2021;12:663834. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663834

9. Camacho-Carranza Á, Almagro BJ. Factores motivacionales, autoestima e intención de ser físicamente activo en el alumnado de formación profesional de modalidad deportiva. E-Balonmano Com J Sports Sci. 2024;20(3):3. doi:10.17398/1885-7019.20.331

10. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press; 2017. doi:10.1521/978.14625/28806

11. Reeve J. Autonomy-supportive teaching: what it is, how to do it. En: Liu WC, Wang JCK, Ryan RM, editores. Building autonomous learners: perspectives from research and practice using self-determination theory. Singapore: Springer; 2016. p. 129-52. doi:10.1007/978-981-287-630-0_7

12. White RL, Bennie A, Vasconcellos D, Cinelli R, Hilland T, Owen KB, et al. Self-determination theory in physical education: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Teach Teach Educ. 2021;99:103247. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103247

13. Vansteenkiste M, Sierens E, Soenens B, Luyckx K, Lens W. Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. J Educ Psychol. 2009;101(3):671-88. doi:10.1037/a0015083

14. González-Cutre D, Sicilia Á. The importance of novelty satisfaction for multiple positive outcomes in physical education. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2019;25(3):859-75. doi:10.1177/1356336X18783980

15. González-Cutre D, Sicilia Á, Sierra AC, Ferriz R, Hagger MS. Understanding the need for novelty from the perspective of self-determination theory. Personal Individ Differ. 2016;102:159-69. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.036

16. Bagheri L, Milyavskaya M. Novelty–variety as a candidate basic psychological need: New evidence across three studies. Motiv Emot. 2020;44(1):32-53. doi:10.1007/s11031-019-09807-4

17. González-Cutre D. La necesidad de novedad en el ámbito de la actividad física y el deporte desde la teoría de la autodeterminación: Reflexiones sobre una década de evidencias. E-Motion Rev Educ Mot E Investig. 2025;(25):62-8. doi:10.33776/EUHU/remo.vi25.9350

18. Vasconcellos D, Parker PD, Hilland T, Cinelli R, Owen KB, Kapsal N, et al. Self-determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Educ Psychol. 2020;112(7):1444-69. doi:10.1037/edu0000420

19. Fernández-Espínola C, Almagro BJ, Tamayo-Fajardo JA, Sáenz-López P. Complementing self-determination theory with the need for novelty: motivation and intention to be physically active in physical education students. Front Psychol. 2020;11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01535

20. Fierro-Suero S, Fernández-Ozcorta EJ, Sáenz-López P. Students’ motivational and emotional experiences in physical education across profiles of extracurricular physical activity: the influence on the intention to be active. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(15). doi:10.3390/ijerph19159539

21. Valero-Valenzuela A, Huescar E, Núñez JL, Conte L, Léon J, Moreno-Murcia JA. Prediction of adolescent physical self-concept through autonomous motivation and basic psychological needs in Spanish physical education students. Sustainability. 2021;13(21):21. doi:10.3390/su132111759

22. Neubauer AB, Voss A. Validation and revision of a German version of the Balanced Measure of Psychological Needs Scale. J Individ Differ. 2016;37(1):56-72. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000188

23. Moreno-Murcia JA, González-Cutre D, Garzón MC, Rojas NP. Adaptación a La Educación Física de la escala de las necesidades psicológicas básicas en el ejercicio. Rev Mex Psicol. 2008;25(2):295-303.

24. Vlachopoulos SP, Michailidou S. Development and initial validation of a measure of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in exercise: the basic psychological needs in exercise scale. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2006;10(3):179-201. doi:10.1207/s15327841mpee1003_4

25. Núñez JL, Martin-Albo J, Navarro JG. Validación de la versión española de la Échelle de Motivation en Éducation. Psicothema. 2005;17(2):344-9.

26. Vallerand RJ, Blais MR, Brière NM, Pelletier LG. Construction et validation de l’échelle de motivation en éducation (EME). [Construction and validation of the Motivation toward Education Scale.]. Can J Behav Sci Rev Can Sci Comport. 1989;21(3):323-49. doi:10.1037/h0079855

27. Moreno JA, Moreno R, Cervelló E. El autoconcepto físico como predictor de la intención de ser físicamente activo. Psicol Salud. 2007;17(2):261-7.

28. Hein V, Müür M, Koka A. Intention to be physically active after school graduation and its relationship to three types of intrinsic motivation. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2004;10(1):5-19. doi:10.1177/1356336X04040618

29. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1965.

30. Martín-Albo J, Núñez JL, Navarro JG, Grijalvo F. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: translation and validation in university students. Span J Psychol. 2007;10(2):458-67. doi:10.1017/s1138741600006727

31. Bollen KA, Long JS. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1993.

32. Richardson JTE. Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educ Res Rev. 2011;6(2):135-47. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001

33. Heredia-León DA, Manzano-Sánchez D, Gómez-Mármol A, Valero-Valenzuela A. Prediction of the adherence to sports practice of young Ecuadorians based on the perception of the coach’s interpersonal style. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1133583. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1133583

34. Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, Biddle SJH. A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2002;24(1):3-32. doi:10.1123/jsep.24.1.3

35. Vallerand RJ. Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. En: Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 29. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press; 1997. p. 271-360. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2

36. Ntoumanis N, Ng JYY, Prestwich A, Quested E, Hancox JE, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, et al. A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health. Health Psychol Rev. 2021;15(2):214-44. doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529

37. Reeve J, Cheon SH. Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educ Psychol. 2021;56(1):54-77. doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1862657

38. Fierro-Suero S, Sáenz-López P, Carmona-Márquez J, Almagro BJ. Achievement emotions, intention to be physically active, and academic achievement in physical education: gender differences. J Teach Phys Educ. 2023;1-9. doi:10.1123/jtpe.2021-0230

39. Ng JYY, Ntoumanis N, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Deci EL, Ryan RM, Duda JL, et al. Self-Determination Theory Applied to Health Contexts: A Meta-Analysis. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7(4):325-40. doi:10.1177/1745691612447309

40. Wanwan Z, Khairani AZ. The influence of perceived autonomy support on physical activity among high school students: the mediating roles of basic psychological needs. Behav Sci. 2025;15(4):536. doi:10.3390/bs15040536

41. González-Cutre D, Ferriz R, Beltrán-Carrillo VJ, Andrés-Fabra JA, Montero-Carretero C, Cervelló E, et al. Promotion of autonomy for participation in physical activity: a study based on the trans-contextual model of motivation. Educ Psychol. 2014;34(3):367-84. doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.817325

42. Amado D, Villar FD, Leo FM, Sánchez-Oliva D, Sánchez-Miguel PA, García-Calvo T. Effect of a multi-dimensional intervention programme on the motivation of physical education students. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(1):e85275. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085275

43. Moustaka FC, Vlachopoulos SP, Kabitsis C, Theodorakis Y. Effects of an autonomy-supportive exercise instructing style on exercise motivation, psychological well-being, and exercise attendance in middle-age women. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(1):138-50. doi:10.1123/jpah.9.1.138

Published

2026-03-31

Versions

Dimensions

PlumX

Citations

Issue

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Camacho-Carranza, Ángel, Ramírez-Sánchez, P., Fierro-Suero, S., & Almagro, B. J. (2026). Effects of a teaching intervention on the intention to be physically active in students of the Physical Conditioning Vocational Training programme . Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencias De La Actividad Física Y El Deporte, 15(1), 158-169. https://doi.org/10.24310/riccafd.15.1.2026.22250