The Fractured Recognition: sociopolitical actuality of Hegel's early Jena writings

sociopolitical actuality of Hegel's early Jena writings.

Authors

  • Bruno Leon Campos Cabrera Pontifical Catholic University of Chile image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/Studiahegelianastheg.v9i.16214

Keywords:

Recognition, Social Conflict, Social Fragmentation, Social Pathologies, Hegel in Jena

Abstract

The extensive proliferation of social conflicts of groups that claim political exclusion, institutional indifference, and underestimation of their forms of life, are evidence of the conceptual insufficiency of the end of history of Fukuyama's Hegel. These collective subjects are not perceived as part of the organic unity that is the social, but rather as cleaved fragments, unrelated to it. I suggest that we can give explanatory value and to grant a normative solution to this social fracture through the concept of recognition developed by Hegel in his Jenense period. Thus, as an update of this concept, these social conflicts can be understood as struggles for the recognition for some of its dimensions, affective, legal and/or social, that have been unjustly denied.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Downloads

Published

2023-05-29

Dimensions

PlumX

Issue

Section

STUDIES

How to Cite

The Fractured Recognition: sociopolitical actuality of Hegel’s early Jena writings: sociopolitical actuality of Hegel’s early Jena writings. (2023). STUDIA HEGELIANA. JOURNAL OF THE SPANISH SOCIETY FOR HEGELIAN STUDIES, 9, 75-92. https://doi.org/10.24310/Studiahegelianastheg.v9i.16214