What is a minor image? Notes on the political possibilities of visual self-representation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Umatica.2021.v3i4.13561Keywords:
self-representation, visual culture, representation, subalternityAbstract
This work examines the notion of self-representation from the vantage point of the subaltern studies, and the idea of collective subjectivity under the concept of “minor image”. In order to develop this approach, the present dissertation rethinks the concepts of representation and enunciation in the context of digital images, by means of implying a radical critique of the paradigms of representational interpretation. It is necessary to think about the performative and rhetorical dimension of images, their articulations through discourses and their ability to disassemble, to verify or to consolidate these same discourses. The political strength of images cannot be examined only through the long-established critique of representation; it rather needs an understanding of every representational act as linked to an epistemic value. Finally, the concept of “minor image” is proposed in a sense that, combined with the contemporary dimension of epistemic injustice, aims at a reiteration of the political relevance of self-representation.
Downloads
References
Bhabha, H. (2015). “The Beginning of Their Real Enunciation: Stuart Hall and the Work of Culture”. En Critical Inquiry, Vol. 42, No. 1 (2015), pp. 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/682994
Brea, J.L. (2010). Las tres eras de la imagen. Madrid: Akal.
Butler, J. (2018). Mecanismos psíquicos del poder. Madrid: Cátedra.
Butler, J. (2018b). Cuerpos aliados y lucha política. Barcelona: Paidós.
Caldeira, S. P., De Ridder, S., & Van Bauwel, S. (2018). “Exploring the Politics of Gender Representation on Instagram: Self-representations of Femininity.” DiGeSt. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies, 5(1), 23-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11116/digest.5.1.2
Collier, J. (ed.) (1986). Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Couldry, N. (2010). Why Voice Matters. Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism. London: SAGE.
Chaturvedi, V. (2000) (ed.). Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial. London / New York: Verso.
Chouliaraki, L (2017) Symbolic bordering: the self-representation of migrants and refugees in digital news. Popular Communication 15(2): 78–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2017.1281415
Devereux, L., Hillman, R. (eds.) (1995). Fields of Vision. Essays in Film Studies. Visual Anthropology and Photography. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520914704
Díaz de Rada, A. (2010). Cultura, Antropología y otras tonterías. Madrid: Trotta.
Erickson, E. (1977), “La identidad psicosocial”, en Enciclopedia Internacional de las Ciencias Sociales, tomo V. Madrid: Aguilar.
Espósito, R. (2009). Comunidad, Inmunidad y Biopolítica. Madrid: Herder.
Fanon, F. (2009). Piel negra, máscaras blancas. Madrid: Akal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9788523212148
Ford, J. G. (1991). Informe Ford sobre el racismo en Europa. Madrid: Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales.
Foster, H. (1996). The Return of The Real. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Fricker, M. (2016). Injusticia epistémica. Madrid: Herder.
Gunthert, A. (2018). ‘La consagración de la selfie. Una historia cultural.’ Nexus Comunicación, 24. Agosto-diciembre de 2018, 16-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25100/nc.v0i24.7691
Habermas, J. (1987). Teoría de la acción comunicativa, vol. 1. Madrid: Taurus.
Hall, S. (1990). “Cultural Identity and Diaspora”, en Ruthenford, J. (ed.): Identity: Community, Culture, Difference. London: Lawrence & Wishant.
Hall, S. (ed.) (1997). Representation. Glasgow: The open university.
Hendry, J. (2005). Reclaiming Culture. Indigenous People and Self-Representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979421
Highfield, T. (2016). Social Media and Everyday Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
hooks, b. (1992). Black Looks: Race and Representation. Boston, MA: South End Press.
Lacan, J. (1994). El Seminario 4. La relación de objeto. Barcelona: Paidós.
Lister, M. (ed.) (2013). The photographic image in Digital Culture. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797563
Maggio, J. (2007). “Can The Subaltern be Heard? Political Theory, Translation, Representation, and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak.” En Alternatives 32 (2007), pp. 419-443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540703200403
Mignolo, W. (2010). Desobediencia epistémica: Retórica de la modernidad, lógica de la colonialidad y gramática de la descolonialidad. Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Signo.
Montero Fayad, D. (2019) “El museo como límite. Apuntes sobre la representación y la autorrepresentación”, en Nierika. Revista de estudios de arte, No. 15, pp. 80-91
Moxey, K. (2015). El tiempo de lo visual. La imagen en la historia. Barcelona: Sans Soleil.
Pollock, G. (2001). “Modernidad y espacios de la femineidad”. En Cordeiro Reiman e Inda Sáenz (eds.), Crítica feminista en la teoría e historia del arte. Ciudad de México: Universidad Iberoamericana.
Raun, T. (2016). Out Online: Trans Self-Representation and Community Building on Youtube. London: Routledge.
Ribeiro, D. O. (2017). Que é: lugar de fala? Belo Horizonte: Letramento.
Spivak, G. C. (2009). ¿Pueden hablar los subalternos? Barcelona: MACBA.
Spivak, G. C. (2010). Crítica de la razón poscolonial. Madrid: Akal.
Stoichita, V. I. (2016). La imagen del Otro: Negros, judíos, musulmanes y gitanos en el arte occidental en los albores de la Edad Moderna. Madrid: Cátedra.
Thumin, N. (2012). Self-Representation and Digital Culture. Londres: Palgrave Mcmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137265135
Weber, M. (1984). Economía y sociedad. Esbozo de sociología comprensiva. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económico.
Downloads
Published
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
All contens publishes in Umática.Revista sobre Creación y Anáisis de la Imágen are protected under the Creative Commos Attribution-NonComercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.
All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Umática.Revista sobre Creación y Anáisis de la Imágen recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights, which will be transferred to University of Malaga in open access. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Fotocinema. Umática.Revista sobre Creación y Anáisis de la Imágen is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.
Copyright note: Authors who have publications with this journal agree and certify to the following terms:
- That he/she has contributed directly to the intellectual content of the work, for which he/she is responsible for all purposes.
- That he/she approves the contents of the manuscript submitted to the editorial process of UMÁTICA, REVISTA SOBRE CREACIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LA IMAGEN, and therefore agrees that his/her name appears as the author(s).
- That the content of the article has not been published and that it does not appear in any other work that is about to be published.
- That he/she agrees not to submit it for consideration of another publication while it is in the process of being reviewed by UMÁTICA, REVISTA SOBRE CREACIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LA IMAGEN, nor later in case it is accepted for publication.
- That he/she has not had, nor does any personal or financial affiliations that could prejudice the development or results of the present work.
- That all those persons who have made a substantial contribution to the development of the work, having given their permission for the mention, have been mentioned in the acknowledgments section.
- That he/she agrees to provide, when required by the journal, access to all the data and sources on which the work presented is based.
- That he/she will actively participate in the realization of all those stylistic or orthographic-typographic modifications necessary for the publication of the work when notified by the journal's editorial team.
- That he/she has not violated, and nor will, the laws and human or animal rights during the process of research and publication of this work.
- That, none of the institutions in which he/she carries out his/her scientific and research work has presented objections to the publication of the manuscript submitted for evaluation.
- That data and references to materials published are credited and included in the references and citations and, in the cases required, have the due authorizations of those who own the patrimonial rights.
- That any material used is free of copyright. Author(s) is responsible for any litigation or claim related to intellectual property rights, exonerating UMÁTICA, REVISTA SOBRE CREACIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LA IMAGEN (UMÁTICA, CREATION AND ANALYSIS OF IMAGE JOURNAL) of any responsibility.
- That in case the work is approved for publication, authorizes the publisher to include the text in the journal UMÁTICA, REVISTA SOBRE CREACIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LA IMAGEN and to reproduce, edit, distribute, exhibit and communicate it in the country and abroad by printed, electronic, CD, Internet or any other means known or to be known.
How to Cite
23.png)
