Engaging the Bricolage
Bits and Pieces of Rigour in Critical Qualitative Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/cpe.1.1.2025.22419Keywords:
Bricolage, Investigación cualitativa, Interdisciplinariedad, Rigor académico, Generación del conocimientoAbstract
This article explores the notion of the bricoleur within qualitative research, presenting it as an interdisciplinary and multi-methodological strategy that integrates diverse theoretical and philosophical perspectives. The author argues that the bricoleur is an essential tool to grasp the complexity of contemporary reality, while enabling rigorous forms of knowledge production that go beyond the constraints of traditional disciplinary frameworks. Finally, the article examines ways of fostering this boundary work, aiming to strengthen a more sophisticated and critical intellectual rigor within academia.
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
-
—
- Editor & editorial board
- profiles
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- UMA Editorial
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
References
Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work, and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16, 6.
Blommaert, J. (1997). Workshopping: Notes on professional vision in discourse.
Bridges, D. (1997). Philosophy and educational research: A reconsideration of epistemological boundaries. Cambridge Journal of Education, 27, 2.
Dahlbom, B. (1998). Going to the future.
Denzin, N. and Y. Lincoln. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd edition). Thousand Oakes, Sage Publishers.
Dicks, B. and B. Mason (1998) Hypermedia and ethnography: Reflections on the construction of a research approach. Sociological Research Online, 3, 3.
Fischer, F. (1998). Beyond empiricism: Policy inquiry in postpositivist perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 129-46.
Foster, R. (1997) Addressing epistemologic and practical issues in multimethod research: A procedure for conceptual triangulation. Advances in Nursing Education, 202 2.
Friedman, S. (1998). (Inter) disciplinarity and the question of the women's studies Ph.D. Feminist Studies, 24, 2.
Haggerson, N. (2000). Expanding curriculum research and understanding: A ourtho-poetic perspective. Peter Lang Publishing.
Karunaratne, V. (1997). Buddhism, science, and dialectics. http://humanism.org/opinions/articles.html>
Kellner, D. (1995). Media culture: Cultural studies, identity and politics between the modern and postmodern. Routledge.
Kincheloe, J., & Steinberg, S. (1993). A tentative description of post-formal thinking: The critical confrontation with cognitive theory. Harvard Educational Review, 63(3), 296-320.
Kincheloe, J., Steinberg, S. & Hinchey, P. (1999). The postformal reader: Cognition and education. Falmer Press.
Kincheloe, J., & Berry, K. (2004). Rigour and Complexity in Educational Research: Conceptualizing the Bricolage. Open University Press.
Lee, A. (1997). What is MIS? In R. Galliers and W. Currie (Eds.) Rethinking MIS. Oxford University Press.
Lester, S. (1997). Learning for the twenty-first century. <http://www.devmts.demon.co.uk/lrg21st.htm>
Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. University of Chicago Press.
Lutz, K., Jones, K., & Kendall, J. (1997). Expanding the praxix debate: contributions to clinical inquiry. Advances in Nursing Science, 20, 2.
McCarthy, M. (1997). Pluralism, invariance, and conflict. The Review of Metaphysics, 51, l.
McLeod, J. (2000). Qualitative research as bricolage. Paper presented at the Society for Psychotherapy Research Annual Conference, Chicago.
Madison, G. (1988). The hermeneutics of postmodernity: Figures and themes. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
Morawski, J. (1997). The science behind feminist research methods. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 4, pp. 667-82.
Palmer, C. (1996). Information work at the boundaries of science: Linking lbrary services to research practices. Library Trends, 44(2), 165-92.
Pryse, M. (1998). Critical interdisciplinarity, women's studies, and cross-cultural insight. NWSA Journal, 10, 1-11.
Selfe, C. & R. Selfe (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. http://www.hu.mtu.edu/~cyselfe/texts/politics.html
Steinberg, S. R. & Kincheloe, J.L. (1998). Students as Researchers: Critical Visions, Emancipatory Insights. In Students as Researchers, J.L. Kincheloe and S.R. Steinberg.
Steinberg, S.R. & Kincheloe, J.L. (2012). Employing the Bricolage as Critical Research in Science Education. In Fraser, B., Tobin, K., McRobbie, C. (eds) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht.
Steinberg, S.R. (2012). What’s Critical About Qualitative Research? In Critical Qualitative Research Reader. (coords). Steinberg, S. & Cannella, G. Peter Lang Publishing.
Steinberg, S.R. & Ibrahim, A. (2016). Critically Researching Youth. Peter Lang.
Thomas, G. (1998) The myth of rational research. British Educational Research Journal, 24, 2.
Tobin, K. & Steinberg, S. (2015). Doing Educational Research: A Handbook (2nd Edition). Sense Publishers.
Vareene, H. (1996). The social facting of education: Durkheim's legacy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27, 373-89.
Young, T. & Yarbrough J. (1993). Reinventing Sociology: Mission and methods for postmodern sociologists. Red Feather Institute. Transforming Sociology Series, 154.
Zammito, J. (1996). Historicism, metahistory, and historical practice: The historicization of the historical subject. http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~sprague/zammito.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Contrapuntos en Educación. Revista del Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Formación de Profesionales de la Educación. IFE-UMA.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All contents published in Contrapuntos en Educación are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Contrapuntos en Educación recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights, which will be transferred to University of Malaga in open access.
The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Contrapuntos en Educación is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.
