La prison Camusienne dans L'étranger

un donjon de terreur ou un ennui

Authors

  • Paul Brown L’Université Clark Atlanta United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/analecta.v43i.15934

Keywords:

anti-prisoner, penal psychology, rebel, imprisonment, rebellion, act of refusing

Abstract

Imprisonment is meant to be a punishment, a torture if you will, but not a place of detention where the prisoner is indifferent to his fate. However, we see in the Stranger by Albert Camus characters who find themselves, or will find themselves in situations of captivity, but who face them with honesty or indifference. They are called anti-prisoners —beings who reverse the effect of penal psychology. Instead of suffering from the experience, they triumph over it and end up freeing themselves in their own way. If we observe penal psychology over the centuries, we will see that these characters reflect a true segment of the prison population by their unusual reaction.
Meursault’s mother spent the last years of her life in an old people’s home where she was happy, or at least satisfied. Salamano’s spaniel escapes to end his ordeal. In doing so, he destroys the joy of punishing that Salamano exerted. Meursault himself ends up completely flouting both his lawyer and the investigating judge as well as the prosecutor by refusing to play the legal game, to fight to save his life in a dishonest way.
These three characters are not prisoners, but anti-prisoners. They escape from their jailer and destroy the psychology of the punishment process. Camus has created beings that may seem unlikely, but which signal the strength of the rebels who maintain their self esteem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

BACHELARD, G. (1958): La Poétique de l’espace, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

BARTOLLAS, C., S. MILLER and S. DINITZ (1976): Juvenile Victimization: The Institutional Paradox, Sage Publications, New York.

BEAUMONT, G. de et A. de TOCQUEVILLE (1845): Système Pénitentiaire aux Etats-Unis, Librairie de Charles Gosselin, Paris.

BIRENBAUM, H. (1971): Hope is the Last to Die, Twayne, New York.

BOX, S. (1976): Power, Crime and Mystification, Tavistock Publications, London.

CAMUS, A. (1951): L’Homme Revolté, Editions Gallimard, Paris.

CAMUS, A. (1955): L’Etranger, Appelton-Century Crofts, New York.

CAMUS, A. (1971): Mort Heureuse, Editions Gallimard, Paris.

DELBO, C. (1971): Auschwitz et Apres III: Mesure de nos jours, Les Editions de Minuit, Paris.

DES PRES, T. (1976): The Survivor: An Anatomy of Life in the Death Camps, Oxford University Press, New York.

FOUCAULT, M. (1975): Surveiller et Punir: Naissance de la Prison, Editions Gallimard, France.

FRANKL, V. E. (1959): Man’s Search for Menaing, Beacon Press, Boston.

HAWKINS, G. (1976): The Prison: Policy and Practice, The University of Chicago.

JOHNSTON, N., L. SAVITZ and M. E. WOLFGANG (1935): The Sociology of Punishment and Correction, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.

SARTRE, J. P. (1970): L’Existentialisme est un Humanisme, Les Editions Nagel, Paris.

WOLFGANG, M. E. (1979): Prisons: Present and Possible, Lexington Books, Massachusetts.

Published

2022-12-24

How to Cite

Brown, P. (2022). La prison Camusienne dans L’étranger: un donjon de terreur ou un ennui. Analecta Malacitana. Revista De La sección De Filología De La Facultad De Filosofía Y Letras, 43, 9–35. https://doi.org/10.24310/analecta.v43i.15934