Transcendental criticism of meaning and validity. About the regulatory scope of discourse rules in language transcendental-pragmatics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v19i2.1106Keywords:
Pragmatic; Language; Meaning; Action; ValidityAbstract
This paper addresses the fundamental problem concerning transcendental pragmatics of language referring to the regulatory scope of the rules of discourse. After presenting the main features that these rules manifest in the transcendental pragmatics (I), we develop the discussion about their regulatory reach (II). Reconstructing and criticizing Karl-Otto Apel’s solution to this problem (III), we propose a solution schematically (IV) and finally, we draw some conclusions that can be considered for future development of this proposal (V).
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Dimensions
Citations
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate free access to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public. All content published in Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, are subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license whose full text can be found at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions of the images that are subject to copyright.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal will retain the non-exclusive right to use their contributions for academic, research and educational purposes, including self-archiving or repository in open access repositories of any kind.
The electronic edition of this magazine is edited by the Editorial Service of the University of Malaga (Uma Editorial), being necessary to cite the origin in any partial or total reproduction.
5.png)
