Politicising the Verfallen: indications for a critical reconstruction of the ontological problem of the Fall
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/contrastes.29.2.2024.16190Keywords:
Verfallen, Ontological difference, Heidegger, Marcuse, HegelAbstract
This article aims to reconstruct the ontological understanding underlying the different thematizations of the phenomenon of the Fall in Heidegger and Marcuse. I hold that the extension of 'ontological difference' is essentially different, given the 'dialectical correctness' of phenomenology demanded by Marcuse. In contrast to an originally temporal understanding of being, a normative dimension is introduced into the temporal unfolding of being. Thereby, a fundamentally different understanding of the Fall is given. The indications of this problematic are elaborated on the basis of their own particular reception of Hegelian philosophy.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate free access to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public. All content published in Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, are subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license whose full text can be found at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions of the images that are subject to copyright.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal will retain the non-exclusive right to use their contributions for academic, research and educational purposes, including self-archiving or repository in open access repositories of any kind.
The electronic edition of this magazine is edited by the Editorial Service of the University of Malaga (Uma Editorial), being necessary to cite the origin in any partial or total reproduction.
How to Cite
5.png)
