Damasio's insight: the information from affect

Authors

  • Andrea F Melamed IIF (SADAF - CONICET)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/contrastes.29.3.2024.19604

Keywords:

emotions, Damasio, agency, cognition

Abstract

Antonio Damasio's book Descartes' Error (1994) is a landmark in the discussions regarding human mind and emotions, both for its characterization of emotions and for the role they play in our mental economy. In this paper I intend to extend the spirit of Damasio's approach showing that emotions are not only indispensable for decision making and rational thinking, but that they are also essential for agency. I will begin by offering a brief reconstruction of his proposal, emphasizing his improvements over the original Jamesian intuition (section I). Then, I will address the value of emotions for agency by synthesizing the contribution Damasio provided with his hypothesis of somatic markers and, secondly, by gathering other contributions that strengthen the argument for the influence of emotions on other aspects of our mental life (section II).  Finally (section III) I will suggest a way of reinterpreting the phenomena presented, in order to integrate what I consider to be Damasio's insight, namely the revolution introduced at core of the conceptualization of emotions and their importance for agency.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BARRETT, L. F. (2017). How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Houghton-Mifflin-Harcourt.

CAPGRAS, J., & REBOUL-LACHAUX J. (1923). «L’illusion des ‘‘sosies’’ dans un délire systématisé chronique». Bulletin de la Société Clinique de Médecine Mentale, 11,6-16. Reprinted in H. D. Ellis, J. Whitley, & J. P. Luauteé (Eds.). (1994). «Delusional misidentifications: The three original papers on the Capgras, Fregoli and intermetamorphosis delusions». History of Psychiatry, 5, 117-146.

CLORE, G. L. & BAR-ANAN, Y. (2007). «Affect-as-Information». In R. Baumeister & K. Vohs (Eds.) Encyclopedia of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

CLORE, G. L., GASPER, K., & GARVIN, E. (2001). «Affect as information». In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 121–144). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers

DAMASIO, A. R., TRANEL, D., & DAMASIO, H. (1991). «Somatic markers and the guidance of behaviour: theory and preliminary testing». En H. S. Levin, H. M. Eisenberg, & A. L. Benton (Eds.), Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction (pp. 217–229). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195062847.003.0011

DAMASIO, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. Nueva York: Grosset/Putnam.

DEIGH, J. (2014). «William James and the Rise of the Scientific Study of Emotion». Emotion Review, 6(1), 4-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913496483

DÖRING, S. A. (2010). «Why be emotional». In Peter Goldie (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion. Oxford University Press. pp. 283--301.

ELLIS, H. D. Y DE PAUW, K. W. (1994). «The Cognitive Neuropsychiatric Origins of the Capgras Delusion». En David, A. S. y Cutting, J. C. (eds.), The Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia (pp. 317-335). Mahwah: Erlbaum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315785004-18

ELLIS, H. D. Y LEWIS, M. (2001). «Capgras Delusion: A Window on Face Recognition». Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5, 4, 149-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01620-X

GOLDIE, P. (2000). The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

HACKER, P. M. S. (2009). «The Conceptual Framework for the Investigation of Emotions». En Y. Gustafsson, C. Kronqvist, & M. McEachrane (Eds.), Emotions and Understanding: Wittgensteinian Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584464_4

HANSON, N. R. (1971). Observation and Explanation: A Guide to Philosophy of Science. New York: Harper & Row.

JAMES, W. (1884). «What is an Emotion?» Mind 9, 188-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/os-IX.34.188

JAMES, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. Chicago: Enciclopaedia Britannica, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000

KANDEL, E. R., SCHWARTZ, J. H., & JESSELL, T. M. (1997). Neurociencia y conducta. Prentice Hall.

LEDOUX, J. E. (1989). «Cognitive-Emotional Interactions in the Brain». Cognition & Emotion, 3(4), 267–289. http://doi.org/10.1080/02699938908412709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938908412709

PÉREZ, D. I. y MELAMED, A .F. (2020). «La razón en las pasiones y las pasiones en la razón: Un entretejido desatendido». En J. Vidal & C. Muñoz (Eds.), Perspectivas de la subjetividad (pp. 213-230). Editorial de la Universidad de Concepción.

PRINZ, J. J. (2004). Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.

PRINZ, J. J. (2005a). «Are Emotions Feelings? » Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8–10), 9–25.

PRINZ, J. J. (2005b). «E­motions, Embodiment, and Awareness». En L. Feldman Barrett, P. M. Niedenthal, & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Emotion and Consciousness (pp. 363–383). New York: The Guilford Press.

RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. (2011). Lo que el cerebro nos dice. Los misterios de la mente humana al descubierto. Barcelona: Paidós.

RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. y BLAKESLEE, S. (1998). Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind. Nueva York: William Morrow.

SACKS, O. (2009). Musicofilia. Relatos de la música y el cerebro. Barcelona: Anagrama.

SCHWARZ, N. (2012). «Feelings-as-information theory». In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289–308). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215

SCHWARZ, N., & CLORE, G. L. (1988). «How do I feel about it? Informative functions of affective states». In K. Fiedler & J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 44-62). Toronto: Hofgrefe International.

ZAJONC, R. B. (1980). «Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences». American Psychologist 35, 2, 151-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.35.2.151

Published

2024-12-20

Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite

Damasio’s insight: the information from affect . (2024). Contrastes. Revista Internacional De Filosofía, 29(3), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.24310/contrastes.29.3.2024.19604