Why should we prefer the weak version of the new theory of photography?

Authors

  • Paloma Atencia Linares National Autonomous University of Mexico image/svg+xml
    Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v23i2.5572

Keywords:

NEW THEORY OF PHOTOGRAPHY, STRICTLY PHOTOGRAPHIC MEDIA, PHOTOGRAPHY, DIARMUID COSTELLO, DOMINIC LOPES

Abstract

Diarmuid Costello has recently supported a radical version of what he calls, following Dominic Lopes, The new theory of photography and he has criticized a position within this theory that he considers weaker and restrictive. Both views – radical and restrictive – are opposed to the received view in the analytic philosophy of photography. However, Costello argues that the weaker version is too close to orthodoxy. This paper constitutes a defense of the purported restrictive view and argues that, as a matter of fact, the radical version is more prescriptive, restrictive and inadequate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Paloma Atencia Linares, National Autonomous University of Mexico
    National Autonomous University of Mexico

References

ATENCIA-LINARES, P. 2012: «Fiction, Nonfiction, and Deceptive Photographic Representation.» The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (1) (January 1): 19–30.

———, 2013. Arts and Facts. Fiction, Nonfiction and the Photographic Medium. Thesis, UCL, University of London.

BARTHES, R. 1980. La cámara lúcida. Buenos Aires: Paidós

BAZIN, A. 2008: ¿Qué es el cine? Madrid: Editorial Rialp.

CAVEDON-TAYLOR, D. 2010: «In Defence of Fictional Incompetence.» Ratio 23 (2): 141–150.

CAVELL, S. 1979: The World Viewed: Reflections on the ontology of film.» Boston: Harvard University Press.

COSTELLO, D. 2017: On Photography. A Philosophical Inquiry. Routledge.

CURRIE, G. 1999: «Visible Traces: Documentary and the Contents of Photographs.» Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (3): 285–297.

FRIDAY, J. 1997: «Digital Imaging, Photographic Representation and Aesthetics.» Ends and Means 2 (2): 7–11.

HOPKINS, R. 2010: «Factive Pictorial Experience: What’s Special About Photographs?» Noûs (December 15).

LOPES, D. 2016: Four Arts of Photography. Willey Blackwell.

MAYNARD, P. 2005: The Engine of Visualization: Thinking Through Photography. Cornell University Press.

PHILLIPS, D. 2009: «Photography and Causation: Responding to Scruton’s Scepticism.» British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (4): 327–340.

RICHTER, G. 1995: «Interview with Rolf Schön» in Richter, The Daily PRactice of Painting: Writings 1962-1993, ed. Hans-Ulrich Obrist (London: Thames & Hudson)

SCRUTON, R. 1981: «Photography and Representation.» Critical Inquiry 7: 577–603.

SONTAG, S. 1973: Sobre la Fotografía. Madrid: Debolsillo.

WALTON, K. 1970: «Categories of Art.» The Philosophical Review 79 (3) (July 1): 334–367.

———, 1984: «Transparent Pictures: On the Nature of Photographic Realism.» Critical Inquiry 11 (2) (December 1): 246–277.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-01

Dimensions

PlumX

Citations

Issue

Section

ARTICLES

How to Cite

Atencia Linares, P. (2019). Why should we prefer the weak version of the new theory of photography?. Contrastes. Revista Internacional De Filosofía, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v23i2.5572