Is pluralistic intentionalism possible?

Authors

  • Alicia Bermejo Salar Universidad de Murcia Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v22i2.3526

Keywords:

Intentionalism, Pluralism, Interpretation, Intention, Meaning

Abstract

In contemporary discussions, one of the main arguments adduced against intentionalism is its supposed incompatibility with interpretative pluralism, due to its monist nature. In this paper I will discus the scope of R. Stecker’s attempt to make monism and pluralism compatible and G. Currie’s pluralist intentionalism. Finally, I will try to show what special kind of pluralism could be endorsed by intentionalism without needing to abandon its concept of art and its idea of artistic interpretation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Alicia Bermejo Salar es doctora en Filosofía por la Universidad de Murcia.

Líneas de Investigación:

Estética y Filosofía del Lenguaje

Publicaciones recientes:

“Is Moderate Intentionalism Necessary?”, en Proceedings of the Conference 2014 de la

European Society for Aesthetics, http://www.eurosa.org/volume-6/

“The Analogy between Arstistic and Linguistic Meaning: The Linguistic Model of Intentionalism

Revisited” en Proceedings of the Conference 2013 de la European Society for Aesthetics,

http://www.eurosa.org/volume-5/

Published

2017-11-24

How to Cite

Bermejo Salar, A. (2017). Is pluralistic intentionalism possible?. Contrastes. Revista Internacional De Filosofía, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v22i2.3526

Issue

Section

ARTICLES