The Problem of the Noble Ideal

Authors

  • David Owen Universidad de Southampton

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/EstudiosNIETen.vi15.10789

Keywords:

noble, re-valuation, moral, ethics

Abstract

Nietzsche’s critique of (slave) «morality» has been, for understandable reasons, a central focus of the reception of his work, however, rather less attention has been paid to what he identifies as «the problem of the noble ideal». While it is widely recognized that Nietzsche is not incoherently advocating a return to, for example, Homeric ethics — a point reinforced by the exemplars to which he directs us (most prominently
Goethe), there is little in the way of analysis of Nietzsche’s concern to overcome the problem of the noble ideal or its implications for understanding his project of re-evaluation. To elucidate this aspect of Nietzsche’s thinking, I’ll begin by drawing attention to the problem of the noble ideal before situating this problem in Nietzsche’s wider reflections on power and ethics. I’ll then focus on how Nietzsche seeks to resolve this problem and what this entails for understanding his project.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • David Owen, Universidad de Southampton

    Profesor de Filosofía social y Política en la Universidad de Southampton. Sus líneas de investigación: Nietzsche y la teoría crítica post-kantiana, problemas de comunidad política, teoría de la democracia. Libros más recientes
    Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morality (Acumen, 2007) dos volúmenes coeditados Multiculturalism and Political Theory (Cambridge University Press 2007) y Recognition and Power (Cambridge University Press, 2007). Coeditor de Critical Powers book series for Bloomsbury Academic and of Citizenship Transitions for Palgrave Macmillan, y Book Reviews Editor for the journal Political Theory. Pertenece al consejo de redacción de Journal of Nietzsche Studies, Max Weber Studies and Political Studies Review.

References

Conant, J., «Nietzsche’s Perfectionism: A Reading of Schopenhauer as Educator», en R. Schacht (ed.) Nietzsche’s Postmoralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 227-228.

Darwall, S., «Respect as Honour and as Accountability», en his Honour, History and Relationship, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 11-29.

Janaway, C., Beyond Selflessness, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Lippitt, J., (ed.), Nietzsche’s Futures, Basingstoke: MacMillan, 1998.

Nietzsche, F., Obras Completas, I-IV (OC ). Director ed. Diego Sánchez Meca. Madrid: Tecnos, 2011-2016.

Nietzsche, F., Correspondencia I-VI. (CO). Director ed. Luis E. de Santiago Guervós. Madrid : Trotta, 2005- 2012.

Nietzsche, F., Fragmentos Póstumos I-IV (FP). Director ed. Diego Sánchez Meca. Madrid: Tecnos, 2006-2010.

Owen, D., Nietzsche’s genealogy of morality, Stockton: Acumen Press, 2007.

Patton, P., “Nietzsche and the Problem of the Actor”, en A. D. Schrift (ed.), Why Nietzsche Still? Reflections on Drama, Culture, Politics, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.

Pippin, R., Nietzsche, Psychology and First Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010

Reginster, B., The Affirmation of Life: Nietzsche on Overcoming Nihilism, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006

Ridley, A., Nietzsche’s Conscience: Six Character Studies from the Genealogy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.

Ridley, A., Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Nietzsche on Art, New York: Routledge, 2007.

Waldron, J., Dignity, Rank and Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Williams, B., Making Sense of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Downloads

Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite