The Trial and Banality of Evil in Hannah Arendt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/Metyper.2016.v0i16.2683Keywords:
Moral judgment, historical judgment, legal judgment, Arendt, the banality of Evil.Abstract
This paper discusses the possibility of making moral and historical judgements, and if these transcend the sheer legal judgment by using the works of Hannah Arendt: Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Study of Evil’s Banality. In addition, I consider Arendt’s theory of the banality of Evil and the relationship of this with other kinds of judgments implicit in the alleged process of Jerusalem. I also consider the incapacity of casting judgment, and the consequences that this bears when incapacitates for reflection and personal responses to moral conflict. I also relate the historical judgment with the question about the impact of individual actions in history.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain their copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which is simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows third parties to share the work provided that its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing arrangements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. depositing it in an institutional telematic archive or publishing it in a monographic volume) provided that initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work via the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematics archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work (see The Open Access Effect).
How to Cite
17.png)
