Ordenaciones de conjuntos de alternativas considerando similitudes: una panorámica

Carmen Vázquez

doi:10.24310/recta.23.2.2022.19878

Authors

Carmen Vázquez Universidad de Vigo Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/recta.23.2.2022.19878

Keywords:

Similitudes entre alternativas, diversidad de alternativas, utilidad cardinal, ordenaci´on de conjuntos de oportunidades

Abstract

This article offers a common perspective for different alternative set ordering proposals. Starting from an agent that has defined a preference relation and a similarity relation over the individual alternatives, an ordering over sets of alternatives that can be very large must be established. For this, the similarities between the alternatives that belong to each of these sets will be taken into account, with this premise several management options have been proposed in independent studies. They are presented here under a common framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

This article

Author statements

Data availability

N/A

16%

External funding

N/A

32%

Competing interests

N/A

11%

This journal

Other journals

Articles accepted

4%

33%

Days to publication

507

145

Indexed in

—

Editor & editorial board: profiles
Academic society: N/A
Publisher: UMA Editorial. Universidad de Málaga

References

Aizpurua, J.M., Nieto, J., Uriarte, J.R. (1990). Choice procedure consistent with similarity relations. Theory and Decision, 29(3): 235-253.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126804

Arlegi, R., García-Lapresta, J.L., Meneses, L.C. (2007). Libertad de elección: algunos enfoques axioma'ticos. Revista Electrónica de Comunicaciones y Trabajos de ASEPUMA Actas, 15(1).

Binder,C.(2014). Preference and similarity between alternatives. Rationality, Markets and Morals Journal, 5: 120-132.

Bossert, W., Pattanaik, P.K., Xu, Y. (1994). Ranking opportunity sets: an axiomatic approach. Journal of Economic Theory, 63: 326-345.

https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1994.1045

Bossert, W., Pattanaik, P.K., Xu, Y. (2000). Choice under complete uncertainty: axiomatic characterization of some decision rules. Economic Theory, 16: 295-312.

https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00004080

Mesiar, R. (2007). Fuzzy set approach to the utility, preference relations, and aggregation operators. European Journal of Operational Research, 176: 414-422.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.07.016

Nehring, K., Puppe, C. (2002). A theory od diversity Econometrica, 70(3): 1155-1198.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00321

Pattanaik, P.K., Peleg, B. (1984). An axiomatic characterization of the lexicographic maximin extension of an ordering over a set to the power set. Social Choice and Welfare, 1: 113-122.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00452883

Pattanaik, P.K., Xu, Y. (2000). On diversity and freedom of choice. Mathematical Social Sciences, 40(2): 123-130.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4896(99)00043-8

Rubinstein, A.(1988). Similarity and decision-making under risk (Is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais paradox?). Journal of Economic Theory, 46: 145-153.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(88)90154-8

Vázquez, C. (2014). Ranking opportunity sets on the basis of similarities of preferences: a proposal. Mathematical Social Sciences, 67: 23-26.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2013.11.001

Vázquez, C. (2020). Ranking opportunity sets taking into account similarity relations induced by moneymetric utility functions, in Mathematical Topics on Representations of ordered structures and utility theory. (Springer ed. ) 313-324.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34226-5_17

Vázquez, C. (2022). Lexicographic criteria for ranking opportunity sets with similarities. Mathematical Social Sciences, 117: 1-5.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2022.02.001