Systematic Literature Review: A Didactic Tool to Promote Self-Learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/rejie.32.2025.21119

Keywords:

Systematic Literature Review, SLR, Evidence, FYP, PRISMA, Cochrane Collaboration

Abstract

This teaching innovation work addresses the impact of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) on university teaching methodology, focusing on student autonomy in searching for and accessing information. The article presents a teaching experience through Systematic Literature Reviews (SLR) as a tool to foster self-learning. The work highlights the systematic methodology of SLR to collect, critically evaluate, integrate, and present findings from multiple research studies on a specific question. Standards and guidelines established by the Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA are detailed to conduct an SLR in a rigorous and reproducible manner. Through our experience, we discuss the importance of formulating a precise and well-defined research question, as well as establishing inclusion and exclusion criteria to select relevant studies. We offer a comprehensive guide for conducting an SLR in final year projects. The SLR are an effective tool to foster self-learning and open new doors to knowledge in the university setting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alvesson, M. & J. Sandberg. 2011. “Generating Research Questions Through Problematization.” Academy of Management Review 36: 247-71. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0188

Bandyopadhyay, S. & S. S. Thakur. 2016. “ICT in Education: Open Source Software and its Impact on Teachers and Students.” International Journal of Computer Applications 51 (6): 19-24.

https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016911915

Barlow, P., M. McKee, S. Basu & D. D. Stuckler. 2017. “The Health Impact of Trade and Investment Agreements: A Quantitative Systematic Review and Network Co-citation analysis.” Global Health 13: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0240-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0240-x

Booth, A., A. Sutton & D. Papaioannou, D. 2016. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Second Edition. Sage. Los Angeles.

Galofré-Vilà, G. 2018. “Growth and maturity: A quantitative systematic review and network analysis in anthropometric history.” Economics & Human Biology 28: 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2017.12.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2017.12.003

Galofré-Vilà, G. 2020. “The Past’s Long Shadow: A Systematic Review and Network Analysis of Economic History”. En Hanes, C. and Wolcott, S. (Ed.) Research in Economic History 36: 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0363-326820200000036003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0363-326820200000036003

Galofré-Vilà, G. 2024. Dinàmiques de creixement econòmic a llarg termini: una innovació educativa fonamentada en l’aprenentatge basat en projectes. Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació 18 (1): 1-2. https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/REIRE/article/view/47062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/reire.48481

Glonti K., G. V. Gordeev, Y. Goryakin, A. Reeves, D. Stuckler, M. McKee & B. Roberts. 2015. “A Systematic Review on Health Resilience to Economic Crises.” PLoS ONE 10 (4): e0123117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123117

Jones, N. & J. O’Shea. 2004. “Challenging hierarchies: The impact of e-learning.” Higher Education 48: 379-395. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000035560.32573.d0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000035560.32573.d0

Moher D. 2009. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” Annals of Internal Medicine 151, 264. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

Murray, J. 2013. Cloud Network Architecture and ICT. Modern Network Architecture. IT Knowledge Exchange. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016911915 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016911915

Owen, G. 2020. “What Makes Climate Change Adaptation Effective? A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Global Environmental Change 62: 102071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102071

Page, M. J., J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, C. D. Mulrow, et al. 2021. “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews.” British Medical journal 372 (71): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pati, D., & L. N. Lorusso. 2018. “How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature.” HERD 11 (1): 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586717747384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586717747384

Simmi K. R., T. Anand & J. Ratan. 2019. “Formulation of Research Question – Stepwise Approach.” Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons 24 (1): 15-20. https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_76_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_76_18

Wang, Y., M. McKee, A. Torbica & D. Stuckler. 2019. “Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media.” Social Science & Medicine 240: 112552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552

Additional Files

Published

2025-06-27

Dimensions

PlumX

Issue

Section

Educational innovation and teaching methodologies

How to Cite

Systematic Literature Review: A Didactic Tool to Promote Self-Learning. (2025). Revista Jurídica De Investigación E Innovación Educativa (REJIE Nueva Época), 32, 57-70. https://doi.org/10.24310/rejie.32.2025.21119