The Ivolution encoder is a valid and reliable device to measure barbell mean velocity during the bench press on a Smith machine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/riccafd.14.1.2025.20324Keywords:
kinematics, resistance, speed, technology, performanceAbstract
Velocity-based training is an effective method for prescribing and assessing the effects of resistance training, using barbell velocity as a key performance indicator. This study aims to analyze the validity and reliability of the new Ivolution encoder in comparison with the ADR system for measuring barbell velocity during the Smith machine bench press. Fourteen resistance-trained subjects participated. After estimating their 1RM in the bench press, subjects completed two equal blocks of 6 repetitions each at 40-60-80% of their 1RM. The mean velocity of the lifting phase was recorded simultaneously with the Ivolution encoder and the ADR encoder. The results showed a nearly perfect correlation (R > 0.9) between the ADR and Ivolution encoders at all intensities, with a low systematic bias (<0.05 m/s) according to Bland-Altman plots. In addition, the Ivolution encoder demonstrated high reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) above 0.8 at all intensities, being higher at lower intensities. In conclusion, the Ivolution encoder is a valid and reliable device for measuring barbell mean velocity during the Smith bench press exercise.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Weakley J, Mann B, Banyard H, McLaren S, Scott T, Garcia-Ramos A. Velocity-based training: From theory to application. Strength Cond J. 2021;43(2):31–49.
González-Badilo J, Sánchez-Medina L, Kingdom U. Movement velocity as a measure to control resistance training intensity. Med Sci Sports. 2010;31(April):346–52.
Sakamoto A, Sinclair PJ, Naito H. Strategies for maximizing power and strength gains in isoinertial resistance training: Implications for competitive athletes. J Phys Fit Sports Med. 2016;5(2):153–66.
Muñoz-López M, Marchante D, Cano-Ruiz MA, Chicharro JL, Balsalobre-Fernández C. Load-, force-, and power-velocity relationships in the prone pull-up exercise. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(9):1249–55.
Pérez-Castilla A, García-Ramos A, Padial P, Morales-Artacho AJ, Feriche B. Load-velocity relationship in variations of the half-squat exercise: Influence of execution technique. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;34(4):1024–31.
Pareja-Blanco F, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Sánchez-Medina L, Sanchis-Moysi J, Dorado C, Mora-Custodio R, et al. Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains and muscle adaptations. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(7):724–35.
Sanchez-Medina L, González-Suárez J. Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training. Med Sci Sports. 2011;43(April):142–52.
García-Ramos A, Pestana-Melero FL, Pérez-Castilla A, Rojas FJ, Haff GG. Mean velocity vs.mean propulsive velocity vs.peak velocity:which variable determines bench press relative load with higher reliability? J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(5):1273–9.
Weakley J, McLaren S, Ramirez-Lopez C, García-Ramos A, Dalton-Barron N, Banyard H, et al. Application of velocity loss thresholds during free-weight resistance training: Responses and reproducibility of perceptual, metabolic, and neuromuscular outcomes. J Sports Sci [Internet]. 2020;38(5):477–85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1706831
Randell AD, Cronin JB, Keogh JWL, Gill ND, Pederseb MC. Effect of instantaneous performance feedback during 6weeks of velocity-based resistance training on sport-specific performance tests. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(1):87–93.
Weakley J, Morrison M, García-Ramos A, Johnston R, James L, Cole MH. The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review. Vol. 51, Sports Medicine. 2021. 443–502 p.
Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine. 1998;26(4):217–38.
Balsalobre-Fernández C, Marchante D, Muñoz-López M, Jiménez SL. Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone app for the measurement of barbell velocity and 1RM on the bench-press exercise. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(1):64–70.
García-Ramos A, Pestana-Melero FL, Pérez-Castilla A, Rojas FJ, Haff GG. Differences in the load-velocity profile between 4 bench-press variants. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(3):326–31.
Jidovtseff B, Harris NK, Crielaard JM, Cronin JB. Using the load-velocity relationship for 1RM prediction. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(1):267–70.
Pérez-Castilla A, Miras-Moreno S, García-Vega AJ, García-Ramos A. The ADR Encoder is a reliable and valid device to measure barbell mean velocity during the Smith machine bench press exercise. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sport Eng Technol. 2024;238(1):102–7.
Hopkins WG. A New View of Statistics: Home Page [Internet]. Sportsscience. 2013. p. 1–6. Available from: http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/newview.html
Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med [Internet]. 2016;15(2):155–63. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Pérez-Castilla A, Piepoli A, Delgado-García G, Garrido-Blanca G, García-Ramos A. Reliability and concurrent validity of seven commercially available devices for the assessment of movement velocity at different intensities during the bench press. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(5):1258–65.
Courel-Ibáñez J, Martínez-Cava A, Morán-Navarro R, Escribano-Peñas P, Chavarren-Cabrero J, González-Badillo JJ, et al. Reproducibility and Repeatability of Five Different Technologies for Bar Velocity Measurement in Resistance Training. Ann Biomed Eng. 2019;47(7):1523–38.
Miller RM, Freitas EDS, Heishman AD, Koziol KJ, Galleti BAR, Kaur J, et al. Test-Retest Reliability Between Free Weight and Machine-Based Movement Velocities. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;00(00):1–5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All the contents published in Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte are subject to the Creative Commons Reconocimento-NoComercia-Compartirigual 4.0 license, the full text of which can be found at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly exposed, provided that:
The authorship and original source of your publication (Journal, editorial and URL of the work) are cited.
They are not used for commercial purposes.
The existence and specifications of this use license are mentioned.
Copyright is of two kinds: moral rights and patrimonial rights. Moral rights are perpetual, inalienable, inalienable, inalienable, inalienable and imprescriptible prerogatives.
In accordance with copyright legislation, Revista Eviterna recognizes and respects the moral rights of the authors, as well as the ownership of the economic right, which will be transferred to the University of Malaga for dissemination in open access.
The economic rights refer to the benefits obtained by the use or disclosure of the works. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte is published in open access and is exclusively authorized to carry out or authorize by any means the use, distribution, disclosure, reproduction, adaptation, translation or transformation of the work.
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions of the images that are subject to copyright.
9.png)
