Ismael Quiles S. J.: interreligious and intercultural dialogue as an aesthetic experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/tsn.18.2025.21360Keywords:
Philosophy of religion, Aesthetics, Comparative Religion, Beauty, TheologyAbstract
The following study aims to delineate the way interreligious dialogue can occur as an aesthetic experience. By affirming the essential divine ineffability, following the line of negative theology in Eastern Orthodox Christianity, we will see how the very act of dialogue demands its transcendence for God in his ultimate essence is unthinkable, but “feelable”, “experienceable”. Under the guidance of two episodes of Scripture, the ideas of the Cappadocian father St. Gregory of Nyssa and various recent specialized papers, we will try to re-signify the place of the aesthetic in the interreligious experience with the final idea of demonstrating how interreligious dialogue can promote the common feeling of that Presence, beyond doctrinal differences, but without leaving them aside. After highlighting the way in which father Ismael Quiles S. J. conceptualized beauty as a fundamental category in the encounter between religions and cultures, we will move on to a general conclusion that presents aesthetics as an essential modality for the encounter between the different religions of the world in the 21st century.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aersten (1992). Truth as Trascendental in Thomas Aquinas. Topoi, 11, 159-171.
Borges, J. L. (1952). Otras inquisiciones. Sur.
Borges, J. L. (2000). Arte poética. Seis conferencias. Crítica.
Borges, J. L. (2005). El otro, el mismo. EMECÉ.
Camus, Albert (1965). Essais. Noces. Éditions Gallimard et Calmann-Lévy.
Cheetham, David (2010). Exploring the Aesthetic “Space” for Inter-religious Encounter. Exchange 39(1), 71-86.
Ekdokimov, Paul (1989). The Art of the Icon. A Theology of Beauty. Oakwood.
Fajardo Pedroza, Camilo Andrés (2012). La teología estética de Hans Urs von Balthasar: aportes para una reflexión y caracterización de la pedagogía de Jesús en el ser del discípulo-maestro. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
Ferrer, Eliseo (2021). Sacrificio y drama del rey sagrado. Star Publishers, S. L.
Frederiks, M. Th. (2005). Kenosis as a Model for Interreligious Dialogue. Missiology, 33(2), 211-222.
Idoeta, Iñaki Preciado (2021). Los Libros del Tao. Tao Te Ching. Trotta.
Llorente, M. P. (2003). Vida pitagórica. Protréptico. Gredos.
Majeska (1973). St. Sophia in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries: The Russian Travelers on the Relics. Dumbarton Oaks Papers (27), 68-87.
Marković, Slobodan (2012). Components of Aesthetic Experience: Aesthetic Fascination, Aesthetic Appraisal, and Aesthetic Emotion. Iperception, 1-17.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2017). El ojo y el espíritu. Madrid: Trotta.
Norris Jr., Richard (2012). Homilies on the Song of the Songs. SBL.
Panikkar, Raimon (1970). Le mystére du culte dans l'hindouisme et Ie christianisme. Ed. du Cerf.
Panikkar, Raimon (1994a). El Cristo desconocido del hinduismo. Para una cristofanía ecuménica. Grupo Libro 88.
Panikkar, Raimon (1994b). La experiencia de Dios. PPC.
Panikkar, Raimon (2015). Obra completa, tomo I.1: Mística y espiritualidad. Herder.
Quiles, I. (1958). Más allá del existencialismo. Barcelona: Editorial Miracle.
Quiles, I. (1978). Antropología filosófica insistencial. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Depalma.
Viladesau, Richard (1999). Theological Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Waaijman, K. (2008). Mystical Perspectives in Interreligious Dialogue. Acta Theologica Supplementum, 11, 221-223.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 TSN. Transatlantic Studies Network

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




















