Executable verses and colourful commands: debates around code poetry

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/umatica.2025.v8i8.21791

Keywords:

code poetry, functionality, electronic literature, materialist poetics, estrangement

Abstract

Code poetry, written in programming languages, belongs to electronic literature. In it, the reader faces the source code rather than the executed result. The main debate within “codework” revolves around executability: whether the poem can be interpreted by the machine and generate an output. Traditionally, works that compile and produce visual or verbal effects are valued more, as they engage both machine processes and human reading. This article revisits the discussion through ./code --poetry (2023) by Daniel Holden and Chris Kerr, arguing that every screen reading is a surface reading, even when using programming languages. It then explores its link with concrete poetry and the OuLiPo movement, highlighting how, by using languages designed for unambiguous commands, code poetry interrupts their usual function and exposes the hidden materiality of these tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
82%
33%
Days to publication 
228
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Universidad de Málaga (España)

References

Alonso Valero, E. (2019). Aproximación a la poesía escrita en lenguajes de programación (sobre Belén García Nieto). Signa: Revista de la Asociación Española de Semiótica, 28, 331-349. https://doi.org/10.5944/signa.vol28.2019.25055

Apirile, F. (2020). Code Poems: 2010-2019. Post-Asemic Press.

Arnaud, N. (1968). Poèmes Algol. Temps meles.

Bénabou, M. (2016). Introducción. Cincuenta siglos del OuLiPo, más seis. En OuLiPo. Ejercicios de literatura potencial (pp. 9-21). Caja Negra.

Benjamin, W. (2015). El autor como productor. Casimiro.

Bertran, I. (Ed.). (2012). Code {poems}. Ishac Bertran. https://monoskop.org/File:Code_Poems_2012.pdf

Black, M. J. (2002). The Art of Code. University of Pennsylvania.

Bootz, P. (2006). Digital Poetry: From Cybertext to Programmed Forms. Leonardo Electronic Almanac, 14, n. 5-6(New Media Poetry and Poetic Special Issue). https://elmcip.net/node/2176

Cayley, J. (2002). The Code is not the Text (Unless It Is the Text). electronic book review. https://electronicbookreview.com/essay/the-code-is-not-the-text-unless-it-is-the-text/

Cayley, J. (2018). Grammalepsy: Essays on Digital Language Art. Bloomsbury.

Chun, W. (2008). On “Sourcery,” or Code as Fetish. Configurations, 16(3), 299-324. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.0.0064

Cramer, F. (2016). Post-digital literary studies. Estudos Literários Digitais 1, 4(1).

Funkhouser, C. T. (2007). Prehistoric Digital Poetry: An Archaeology of forms, 1959-1995. The University of Alabama Press.

Galloway, A. R. (2006). Language Wants To Be Overlooked: On Software and Ideology. Journal of Visual Culture, 5(3), 315-331.

Glazier, L. P. (2002). Digital Poetics: The Making of E-Poetries. University of Alabama Press.

Hayles, K. (2002). Writing Machines. MIT Press.

Hayles, K. (2008). Electronic Literature: New Horizons for the Literary. University of Notre Dame Press.

Holden, D., & Kerr, C. (2023a). ./code—Poetry. Broken Sleep Books and code-poetry.com/home.

Holden, D., & Kerr, C. (2023b). Optimizing Code for Performance: Reading ./code—Poetry. En Poetry and Contemporary Visual Culture / Lyrik und zeitgenössische Visuelle Kultur (Vol. 3, pp. 167-184). de Gruyter.

Hopkins, S. (1992). Camels and Needles: Computer Poetry Meets the Perl Programming Language. Usenix Winter 1992 Technical Conference. https://www.are.na/block/25733863

Jakobson, R., Tinianov, Eichenbaum, Brik, Shklovski, Vinogradov, Tomashevski, & Propp. (1970). Teoría de la literatura de los formalistas rusos (T. Tzvetan, Ed.; A. M. Nethol, Trad.). Siglo XXI.

Leong, M. (2017). Oulipo, Foulipo, Noulipo: The Gendered Politics of Literary Constraints. En The Oulipo (pp. 100-130). Verbivoracious Press.

Mezangelle, Mez Breeze (1994-presente). (s. f.). En Net Art Anthology. Rhizome. https://anthology.rhizome.org/mez-breeze

Miranda, A. (s. f.). Manifesto Proposição-67. Antonio Miranda. http://www.antoniomiranda.com.br/poesia_visual/manifesto_proposicao.html

Morales Benito, L. (2021). El arte del funámbulo. Juego, ’Patafísica y OuLiPo, aproximaciones teóricas y equilibrismos literarios. Universidad Iberoamericana de Puebla.

Raley, R. (2002). Interferences: [Net.Writing] and the Practice of Codework. electronic book review. https://electronicbookreview.com/essay/interferences-net-writing-and-the-practice-of-codework/

Raley, R. (2006). Code.surface || Code.depth. Dichtung Digital. Journal für Kunst und Kultur digitaler Medien, 36(8), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/17695

Szabolscsi, M. (1972). La «vanguardia» literaria y artística como fenómeno internacional. Casa de las Américas, 74, 4-17.

Tenen, D. (2017). Plain Text: The Poetics of Computation. Stanford University Press.

Tenen, D. Y. (2017). Laminate Text: The Strata of Digital Inscription. Amodern, 7. https://amodern.net/article/laminate-text/

Tomasula, S. (2012). Code Poetry and New-Media Literature. En The Routledge Companion to Experimental Literature (pp. 483-496). Routledge.

Turner, F. (2006). From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. University of Chicago Press.

Published

2025-12-13

How to Cite

Garay Arriba, M. (2025). Executable verses and colourful commands: debates around code poetry. UMÁTICA. Journal on Image Creation and Analysis, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.24310/umatica.2025.v8i8.21791

Issue

Section

Articles (RESEARCH AREA)