Happiness as Ideology. A Comparative Analysis of The Pursuit of Happyness and Soul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/fotocinema.31.2025.21862Keywords:
Animation films, Happiness, Identity, Characters, Emotional Self-Management, Symbolic RepresentationAbstract
This article aims to comparatively analyze how the concept of happiness is represented in the films The Pursuit of Happyness (2006) and Soul (2020), based on the theoretical model by Cabanas and Illouz (2019), which frames happiness as an ideological construct aligned with neoliberal personality traits. The study focuses on three aspects: (1) character representation of the protagonists; (2) symbolic depictions of happiness within narrative spaces; and (3) the construction of subjectivities under consumer capitalism. The methodology employs Grueso’s (2020) semiotic model of film analysis and Atlas.ti software to code expressions of emotional self-management, authenticity, and personal growth. The findings reveal that both films reinforce an individualistic and meritocratic view of happiness, although Soul introduces a critique of insatiability at its conclusion. The analysis concludes that these cinematic narratives legitimize a neoliberal model of well-being while silencing collective or structural dimensions of success.
Downloads
Metrics
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
-
—
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- Universidad de Málaga
References
Adriani, Alya R. & Nugroho, Abdillah. (2021). Chris Gardner’s Struggle Reflected on The Pursuit of Happyness Movie: An Individual Psychological Approach. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 9, 213-219. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i2.2244
Barbosa-Rodrigues, M. & Silva-Júnior, Ernane (2022). A procura da felicidade e a teoria do bem-estar: uma visão da psicologia positiva. Psicologia e saúde em debate, 8(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.22289/2446-922X.V8N2A8
Cabanas, E. (2019). Psiudadanos, o la cosntrucción de individuos felices en las sociedades neoliberales. En Illouz, E. Capitalismo, consumo y autenticidad. Las emociones como mercancía (pp. 233-263). Katz editores.
Cabanas, E. & Illouz, E. (2019). Happycracia. Cómo la ciencia y la industria de la felicidad controlan nuestras vidas. Paidós.
Davies, W. (2017). La industria de la felicidad: Cómo el gobierno y las grandes empresas nos vendieron el bienestar. Editorial Malpaso.
Docter, Pete (director), & Powers, Kemp (codirector) (2020). Soul. Estados Unidos: Pixar Animation Studios & Walt Disney Pictures.
Han, Byung-Chui (2024). La sociedad del cansancio. Herder editorial.
IMDbPro (2025). The Pursuit of Happyness. https://pro.imdb.com/title/tt0454921/?ref_=search_search_search_result_1
Kinasih, P. (2021). Semiotic Analysis of the Animation Film Soul. Journal of English Language and Culture, 12(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.46372/arts.982060
Lammon, M. (2022). Disney's Dilemma: Public Response to Pixar's Soul. J Pop Cult, 55: 1290-1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.13192
Lipovetsky, G. (2007). La felicidad paradójica: Ensayo sobre la sociedad del hiperconsumo. Anagrama.
Lipovetsky, G. (2024). La consagración de la autenticidad. Anagrama.
Loach, Ken (director) (2019). Sorry, We Missed You. Francia: Sixteen Films.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harper & Row.
Muccino, Gabriele (director) (2006). The Pursuit of Happyness. Estados Unidos: Columbia Pictures.
Sapkota, S. (2024). The Dream and Ideological Underpinnings in Gabriele Muccino's The Pursuit of Happyness. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 9(5), 47–55. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijels.95.6
Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). Florecer: La nueva psicología positiva y la búsqueda del bienestar. Editorial Océano.
Smith, R. (2024). Intersections of spirituality, relationships, and music education: Applications of lessons from the Pixar film, Soul. International Journal of Music Education, 42(1), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614221141970:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Tanesia, C. Y., Helvinsky, C., H., Sanchia, Y. K. L., & Putra, J. (6-7 July 2021). Analyzing “Soul” as a Representation of Existential Crisis. Proceedings of the IMOVICCON: International Moving Image Cultures Conference. Indonesia. https://ojs.uph.edu/index.php/IMOVICCON/article/view/7262
Zacharek, S. (2020, 25 de Diciembre). Questions, But It’s Best When It Comes Down to Earth. TIME. https://time.com/5923340/soul-review-pixar/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Zeng, L. (2019). Economy, Emotion, and Ethics in Chinese Cinema. Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media, (59). https://ejumpcut.org/archive/jc59.2019/zeng-li/bio.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ingrid Zacipa-Infante, Victoria Tur-Viñes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All contents published in Fotocinema Revista científica de cine y fotografía are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Fotocinema. Revista científica de cine y fotografía recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights, which will be transferred to University of Malaga in open access. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Fotocinema. Revista científica de cine y fotografía is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.







13.png)


