Effects of contextual interference on performance in fifty meters swimming. Case study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/riccafd.14.2.2025.21121

Keywords:

aleatoria, bloque, entrenamiento, estudio experimental

Abstract

The aim was to examine the effect of two types of contextual interference (blocked and randomised) on performance in the 50-metre swimming test. Four boys participated, two of whom performed the performance tests (control participants) and two of whom underwent five weeks of training in each practice condition (blocked and randomised) and the tests (experimental participants). A multiseries intrasubject design of alternating treatments without counterbalancing was applied, as one of the participants first underwent block training and then random training with a non-treatment period between the two, and the other did the opposite. The preliminary results of this case study show that both types of contextual interference are effective in improving performance. However, one participant achieved a higher percentage of effectiveness in random practice and the other in block practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Menayo R. Aprendizaje motor y tenis: el tópico de la interferencia contextual. CV Ciencias del Deporte, 2007.

Collado N. Condiciones de práctica e información visual. El efecto de diferentes programas de práctica. Diss. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 2005.

Porter JM, Magill RA. Systematically increasing contextual interference is beneficial for learning sport skills. J sports Sci. 2010;28(12):1277-1285.

Yanci J, Reina R, Los Arcos A, Camara J. Effects of different contextual interference training programs on straight sprinting and agility performance of primary school students. J Sports Sci Med. 2013;12(3):601–7.

Yanci J, Los Arcos A, Salinero JJ, Plana C, Gil E, Grande I. Efectos producidos por diferentes programas de interferencia contextual en la agilidad/Effects of different contextual interference programs in agility. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte. 2015;405–18.

Moretto NA, Marcori AJ, Okazaki VHA. Contextual interference effects on motor skill acquisition, retention and transfer in sport rifle shooting. Hum Mov. 2018;(2):99–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/hm.2018.74065

Rodríguez NS, Mohamed KM. Efecto de tres tipos diferentes de organización de la práctica en la adquisición y retención de dos habilidades de fútbol. Trances Transmisión del Conocimiento Educativo y de la Salud. 2011;493–510.

Sánchez JA, Arellano R. El análisis de la competición en natación: estudio de la situación actual; variables y metodología. Comunicaciones técnicas. 2003;(1):55–80.

Hay JG. Biomechanics of Sports Techniques. 3a ed. Old Tappan, NJ, Estados Unidos de América: Prentice Hall; 1986.

Haljand R. Competition Analysis. Swimming. European Research. 1992; (28).

Maglischo, Ernest W. Natación: técnica, entrenamiento y competición. Paidotribo, 2011.

Arellano R, De Aymerich J, Sanchez JA, Ribera J. Analisis de la actividad competitiva en natación. Fina short course (25 m) World Championships. Mallorca, España; 1993.

Hannula D, Thornton N. Entrenamiento óptimo en natación. España: Editorial Hispano Europea; 2007.

Cuartero M. Entrenamiento de las Especialidades de Natación. Cultivalibros, 2010.

Barlow DH, Hayes SC. Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979;12(2):199–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1979.12-199

Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59(1):12–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.59.1.12

Battig WF. The flexibility of human memory. Levels of processing and human memory, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1979.

Battig WF. Facilitation and interference. Acquisition of skill. 1966;215–44.

Wright DL. The effect of type of practice on motor learning in children. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1991;5:123–34.

Wright DL, Li Y, Whitacre C. The contribution of elaborative processing to the contextual interference effect. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992;63(1):30–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1992.10607554

Rey D. Effects of contextual interference on the memory of older females differing in levels of physical activity. Perceptual and motor skills. 1982;55(1):171–80.

Porter JM, Magill RA. Systematically increasing contextual interference is beneficial for learning sport skills. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(12):1277–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.502946

Published

2025-12-03

How to Cite

Escudero-Tena, A. (2025). Effects of contextual interference on performance in fifty meters swimming. Case study. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencias De La Actividad Física Y El Deporte, 14(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.24310/riccafd.14.2.2025.21121

Issue

Section

Artículos

Most read articles by the same author(s)