Uso de la regulación oral del profesor como estrategia de ayuda a la comprensión lectora. Un estudio experimental en 3º de primaria de escuelas chilenas
Use of the Teacher’s Oral Regulation as a Strategy to Aid Reading Comprehension: An Experimental Study in Third Grade Students in Chilean Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/isl.vi15.12562Keywords:
Chilean school system, elementary school, reading comprehension, reading skills, teaching of readingAbstract
In the educational task of text comprehension, a frequent activity in classrooms is accompanying reading put into dialogue with interventions from the teacher. One way of organizing this activity is incorporating episodes with a regulatory component that externally promotes a guide for action that allows justifying an explicit goal as a success indicator. The goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of a reading planning episode comprised of regulatory oral aid with components associated with the justification of the reading activities and the specification of reading comprehension goals for children in 3rd grade of elementary school in the Chilean school system, with a sample distributed among 4 experimental groups: with/without regulatory verbalized intervention and autonomous/non-autonomous reading. It can be pointed out that Chilean students benefitted from isolated regulatory aid or regulatory aid accompanied by oral reading once it was matched with measures of non-verbal intelligence, memory, vocabulary, oral and text comprehension, precision, and word reading speed. This portrays the relevance of evaluating and discussing these implications within the area of the initial and continuous training of teachers.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J., y Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students' conceptual understanding of complex systems with Tene hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1-2), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.2190/DVWX-GM1T-6THQ-5WC7
Bustos, A., Montenegro, C., Jarpa, M., Calfual, K. y Tapia, A. (2019). En las salas de primaria ¿Cómo se lee para aprender? Revista ESPACIOS. 40 (41). http://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n41/19404125.html
Bustos, A., Montenegro, C., Tapia, A., y Calfual, K. (2017). Leer para aprender: Cómo interactúan los profesores con sus alumnos en la Educación Primaria. Ocnos, 16 (1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2017.16.1.1208
Bustos, A. (2009). La competencia retórica y el aprendizaje de la Lengua Escrita. ¿Se puede hablar de una competencia específica? [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Salamanca]. Repositorio documental de la Universidad de Salamanca https://gredos.usal.es/bitstream/handle/10366/76223/DPEE_BustosIbarraA_CompetenciaRetorica.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Cain, K., y Oakhill, J. (2011). Matthew effects in young readers: Reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development. Journal of learning disabilities, 44(5), 431-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411410042
Cain, K., y Oakhill, J. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and writing, 11(5-6), 489-503. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
Cain, K., y Oakhill, J. (2007). Reading comprehension difficulties: correlates, causes and consequences. In Cain, K. & Oakhill, J.V. (Eds.). Children´s comprehension problems in oral and written language. Editorial Guilford Press.
Catts, H., Adlof, S., Hogan, T., y Weismer, S. (2005). Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders?. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(6), 1378-1396. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/096)
Cuetos, F., Arribas, D. y Ramos, J. (2016). PROLEC-SE-R. Batería de Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores – Revisada. TEA Ediciones.
Deci, E. L., y Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
De Mier, M. V.; Borzone, A.M., y Cupani, M. (2012). La fluidez lectora en los primeros grados: relación entre habilidades de decodificación, características textuales y comprensión. Un estudio piloto con niños hablantes de español. Revista Neuropsicología Latinoamericana, 4(1), 18-33.
De Mier, V., Borzone, A. M. Sánchez Abchi, V. y Benítez, M. E. (2013). Habilidades de comprensión y factores textuales en los primeros grados. Revista Peruana de Psicología y Trabajo Social, 2(1), 89-106.
Díaz A., Melo G., Valtierra B., y Sepúlveda B. (2013). Análisis de la práctica pedagógica: Presencia de la Lectura Colectiva Genuina en las salas de clase en cuatro estudios de caso en tercero y cuarto año básico. Viña del Mar: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso.
Diakidoy, I., Kendeou, P., y Ioannides, C. (2003). Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(2), 335-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00039-5
Eccles, J. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational Beliefs, Values and Goals. En S. T. Fiske, D. L. Schacter & C. Sahn-Waxler (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology (pp. 109-132). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
Elbro, C. y Buch-Iversen, I. (2013). Activation of Background Knowledge for Inference Making: Effects on Reading Comprehension . Journal Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 435-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.774005
García, J., Bustos, A., y Sánchez, E. (2015). The contribution of knowledge about anaphors, organisational signals and refutations to reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(4), 405-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12021
Gough, P., y Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and special education, 7(1), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12021
Graesser, A. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. McNamara (Ed.), Theories of text comprehension: The importance of reading strategies to theoretical foundations of reading comprehension (pp. 3-26). Editorial Erlbaum.
Gutiérrez-Fresneda, R. y Del Olmo, M. T. (2019). Mejora de la comprensión lectora mediante la formulación de preguntas tipo test. Revista Investigaciones sobre Lectura, 11, 93-104. https://doi.org/10.37132/isl.v0i11.286
Hogan, T., Adlof, S. y Alonzo, C. (2014). On the importance of listening comprehension. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 16(3), 199–207. doi:10.3109/17549507.2014.904441.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Kim, Y. (2017). Why the Simple View of Reading Is Not Simplistic: Unpacking Component Skills of Reading Using a Direct and Indirect Effect Model of Reading (DIER). Journal Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643
McCrudden, M., Magliano, J., y Schraw, G. (2010). Exploring how relevance instructions affect personal reading intentions, reading goals and text processing:a mixed methods study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(4),229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.12.001
McCrudden, M., y Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational psychology review, 19(2), 113-139. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7.
McCrudden, M., Schraw, G., y Kambe, G. (2005). The effect of relevance instructions on reading time and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1),88-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88
Millis, K., y Just, M. (1994). The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(1), 128-147. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1007
Novoa, P. F. (2019). Estrategias de aplicación digital en la comprensión de textos narrativos. Investigaciones Sobre Lectura, 11, 37-55. https://doi.org/10.37132/isl.v0i11.277
Nunes, N. (1998) Amostragem Probabilística: um curso introdutório. Editorial Edusp.
Pérez-Peitx, M. y Fons Esteve, M. (2019). Caracterización de las pautas de acción en la didáctica de la alfabetización inicial. Tejuelo 30, 151-174. https://doi.org/10.17398/1988-8430.30.151
Perfetti, C. y Stafura, J. (2014). Word Knowledge in a Theory of Reading Comprehension. Journal Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
Pirolli, P., y Recker, M. (1994). Learning strategies and transfer in the domain of programming. Cognition and instruction, 12(3), 235-275. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1203_2
Raven, J., Raven, J.C. y Court, J. (1993). Test de Matrices Progresivas. Escalas Coloreada, General y Avanzada. Editorial: Paidós Ibérica.
Rosas, R. y Pizarro, M. (2018). WISC-V. Manual de Administración y corrección. Editorial: CEDETI-UC.
Rose, D. 2011. Reading to learn: Accelerating Learning and Closing the Gap. Teacher training books and DVD. Sydney: Ready to Learn. http://www.readingtolearn.com.au
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68-78.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sánchez, E., García-Rodicio, H. y Acuña, S. (2009) Are instructional explanations more effective in the context of an impasse? Instructional Science, 37 (6), 537-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9074-5
Sánchez, E., García, J.R., Castellano, N., de Sixte, R., Bustos, A. y García–Rodicio, H (2008). “Qué, cómo y quién: tres dimensiones para analizar la práctica educativa”. Cultura y Educación, 20 (1), 95–118 https://doi.org/10.1174/113564008783781431
Sánchez, E., García, R. y Rosales, J. (2010). La lectura en el aula. Qué se hace, qué se debe hacer y qué se puede hacer. Editorial Graó.
Sánchez, E. y García, J. (2015). Understanding Teachers as Learners: Considering Teacher Goals when Designing Professional Development Processes. En H. Tillema (Coord). Mentoring for Learning - climbing the Mountain. Editorial: Sense Publishers.
Sánchez, E., García, R., y Bustos, A. (2017). Does rhetorical competence moderate the effect of rhetorical devices on the comprehension of expository texts beyond general comprehension skills?. Reading and Writing, 30 (3), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9684-2
Sanders, T., Spooren, W., y Noordman, L. (1992). Toward a Taxonomy of Coherence Relations. Discourse Processes, 15. 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544800
Stanovich, K. (1993). The construct validity of discrepancy definitions of reading disability. In G.R.Lyon, D.B. Gray, J.F. Kavanagh, & N.A. Krasnegor (Eds.). Better understanding of learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education on public policies (pp. 273-307). Editorial Brookes.
Van den Broek, P. y Helder, A. (2017). Cognitive Processes in Discourse Comprehension:Passive Processes,Reader-Initiated Processes and Evolving Mental Representations. Journal Discourse Processes, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1306677
Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. En M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.13-40). Editorial: Academic Press.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In: Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91-120). Academic Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All contents published in Investigaciones sobre la Lectura are protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All about this license is available in the following link: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
Users can copy, use, redistribute, share and exhibit publicly as long as:
- The original source and authorship of the material are cited (Journal, Publisher and URL of the work).
- It is not used for comercial purposes.
- The existence of the license and its especifications are mentioned.
There are two sets of authors’ rights: moral and property rights. Moral rights are perpetual prerogatives, unrenounceable, not-transferable, unalienable, imprescriptible and inembargable. According to authors’ rights legislation, Investigaciones sobre la Lectura recognizes and respects authors moral rights, as well as the ownership of property rights, which will be transferred to University of Malaga in open access. The property rights are referred to the benefits that are gained by the use or the dissemination of works. Investigaciones sobre la Lectura is published in an open access form and it is exclusively licenced by any means for doing or authorising distribution, dissemination, reproduction, , adaptation, translation or arrangement of works.
Authors are responsable for obtaining the necessary permission to use copyrighted images.