Knowledge mobilization in inclusive education: conceptualization, roles and strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24310/mgnmar.v2i2.10892Keywords:
knowledge mobilization, roles and strategies, inclusive investigationAbstract
This study inquires about knowledge mobilization (KMb) and its connection with inclusive investigation. Methodologically, the study is developed from the qualitative-descriptive research approach, trying to identify the terminology, the conditions, the roles, strategies and intragroup processes which a group of researchers in inclusive investigation. After develop a focal group with these investigators to investigate how they understand and carry out the KMb, the analysis of the information was carried out using the content analysis technique and were established theoretical and inductive categories (emerging from the analysis). Some results indicate that these researchers mobilize knowledge from a paradigm of participative and inclusive investigation, they aspire to coinvestigate to favor a more democratic participation, and the terms of time of this type of research can be a limiting condition. The research concludes trying to stablish guidelines and future research paths of KMb.
Downloads
Metrics
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
Indexed in
-
—
- Editor & editorial board
- profiles
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- Universidad de Málaga
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
References
Ander-Egg, E. (2003). Repensando la investigación-acción participativa. Buenos Aires: Lumen Hvmanitas.
Barrio, J.L. (2009). Hacia una educación inclusiva para todos. Revista Complutense de Educación, 1(20), 13-31. Recuperado de http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/RCED0909120013
Bisquerra, R. (2004). Metodología de la investigación educativa. Madrid: La muralla.
Bonilla-Jiménez, F. I., y Escobar, J. (2017). Grupos focales: una guía conceptual y metodológica. Cuadernos hispanoamericanos de psicología, 9(1), 51-67.
Booth, T., y Ainscow, M. (2002). Guía para la evaluación y mejora de la educación inclusiva. Consorcio Universitario para la Educación Inclusiva. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 16.
Dewey, J. (1995). Democracia y educación. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
Dolbec, A. & Prud’homme, L. (2009). La recherche-action. En B. Gauthier (Dir.), La recherche sociale: de la problématique à la collecte des données (pp. 531-569). Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Echeita, G. (2017). Educación Inclusiva. Sonrisas y lágrimas. Aula Abierta, 46, 17-24. Recuperado de, https://www.unioviedo.es/reunido/index.php/AA/issue/view/917
Fischman, G. E., Anderson, K. T., Tefera, A. A., & Zuiker, S. J. (2018). If mobilizing educational research is the answer, who can afford to ask the question? An analysis of faculty perspectives on knowledge mobilization for scholarship in education. AERA Open, 4(1), 1-17. Recuperado de, https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417750133.
Landry, R., Becheikh, N., Amara, N., Ziam, S., Idrissi, O., & Castonguay, Y. (2008). Revue systématique des écrits sur le transfert de connaissances en éducation. Québec.
Levin, B. (2008, May). Thinking about knowledge mobilization. In an invitational symposium sponsored by the Canadian Council on Learning and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (pp. 15-18).
Moliner, O., y Ramel, S. (2018). Una mirada sobre el trabajo en red del laboratoire international sur l’inclusion scolaire (LISIS): Afianzando una cultura colaborativa para la movilización del conocimiento sobre educación inclusiva. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 22(2), 91-109.
Moliner, O., y Sánchez, T. (2019). Reconstruyendo la figura del asesor en educación inclusiva: Estudio de los procesos de movilización del conocimiento en la formación continua del profesorado. Revista de Educación Inclusiva, 12(1),291-310.
Moliner, O., y St-Vincent, L. A. (2014). Dilemas éticos de los investigadores que acompañan procesos de investigación-acción en el marco de la escuela intercultural inclusiva. Revista latinoamericana de educación inclusiva, 8(2), 49-68.
Parrilla, Á. (2009). ¿Y si la investigación sobre inclusión no fuera inclusiva? Reflexiones desde una investigación biográfico-narrativa. Revista de educación, 349, 101-117.
Parrilla, Á., Raposo-Rivas, M. y Martínez-Figueira, M.E. (2016). Procesos de movilización y comunicación del conocimiento en la investigación participativa. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, (12), 1166-1187.
Pérez, R., García, O., y Ortíz, V. (2016). La movilización del conocimiento para la innovación social. Revista Electrónica Pesquiseduca, 8(16), 277-294.
Perines, H. (2017). Movilización del conocimiento en educación. Conexión entre la investigación, la política y la práctica: una aproximación teórica. Páginas de Educación, 10(1), 137-150.
Reid, S. (2014). Knowledge influencers: leaders influencing knowledge creation and mobilization. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(3), 332-357. DOI 10.1108/JEA-01-2013-0013
Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2018). Guidelines for effective knowledge mobilization.
Traver, J., Sales, A., y Moliner, O. (2010). Ampliando el territorio: algunas claves sobre la participación de la comunidad educativa. REICE: Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 8(3), 96-119.
UQAM. (31 de marzo de 2018). Mobilisation des connaissances. Obtenido de UQAM: https://www.sepsi.uqam.ca/mobilisation-des-connaissances.html#objectifs
Valenzuela, C. E. (2008). Coinvestigación: organizaciones populares y nuevas prácticas de saber. Nómadas, (29), 112-127.
Wang, Q., & Mu, H. (2013). The roles of university researchers in a University-school collaborative action research project-A Chinese experience. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 101-129.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The editorial team of Márgenes supports an open Access policy of scientific knowledge. apostamos claramente por una política de acceso abierto del conocimiento científico (see Berlin Declaration).
Authors with work published in this journal accept the following conditions:
- This journal provides immediate free access to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public. All contents published in Márgenes are subject to the Creative Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions of the images that are subject to copyright.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal will retain the non-exclusive right to use their contributions for academic, research and educational purposes, including self-archiving or deposit in open-access repositories of any kind.
The electronic edition of this magazine is edited by the Editorial of the University of Malaga (UmaEditorial), being necessary to cite the origin in any partial or total reproduction.
- Authors can enter into other additional independent contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g. including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) on the condition that they clearly indicate that the work was originally published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional and personal websites), before and after the publication, as this could lead to constructive exchanges and a more extensive and quick circulation of published works (see The Effect of Open Access).
