Collaborative model of evaluation of learnings in the practicum through Corubric

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/RevPracticumrep.v3i1.8275

Keywords:

Practicum, Alternative Assessment, Collaborative Assessment, Portfolio, Scoring Ru-brics, Video Annotation.

Abstract

In the last curricula the subjects of the Practicum and the External Practices hadan important increase in hours, both in those degrees that already had a trajectory and those for which they represented a new subject. In both cases, they are all involved in new issues, mainly caused by changes in the teaching and assessment of competency- based learning, students’ demands for more practical training related to the world of work, development and impact of technologies as the challenges that accompany them (preservation of identity, confidentiality contracts, repositories and copyright ...), among other important aspects. This paper presents a model based on collaboration where technologies have a relevant role, especially with the use of electronic rubrics and video annotations for tutoring and assessment of learning in the Practicum of the degree of Pedagogy. The model is described, the rubrics used and a list of advantages and requirements to apply the model, especially referred to Corubric.com, leaving for another time the analysis of Coannotation.com by the dimensions of this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Manuel Cebrián de la Serna, University of Malaga

    Full professor Málaga University, (Spain). Research lines: a) educational innovation vs technological innovation; B) University teaching c) Practicum. He has been director of several services of training of university teachers (Sciences of Education Center -1994-98-, Educational Innovation Service -1998-2000-, Virtual Teaching -2000-2004-). He has been an adviser to the Distance Education System (SINED) and the Rectors’ Association (ANUIES) in Mexico. He was awarded the “Order of Puerto Ayacucho” for the Projects developed in Amazonas (Venezuela). External evaluator in evaluation agencies ANEP. Director of the research group: Globalization, Technology, Education and Learning (Gtea), Junta de Andalucía (SEJ-462). Actively Director of the R + D +i projects (Erasmus +, Tempus, Feder, etc.) [http://erubrica.org/]. Nowadays: 1. Study of the impact of technologies in evaluating the competencies in the practicum; 2. Lelenet and 3. Video Annotation Network Project. Editor Practicum Journal and member of the Practicum Network: Association for the development of the practicum and external practices (REPPE). mcebrian@uma.es

References

Bartolomé Pina, A., Canto?n Mayo, I. & Moral Ferrer, J.M. (2017). Una revisio?n a los Prác-ticum de la educacio?n desde las tecnologías. Revista Prácticum, 1(1) 40-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/RevPracticumrep.v1i1.8256

Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. (2017). Recursos tecnológicos para un PLE-portafolios multi-media de calidad para el Prácticum y las prácticas externas. En XIV Symposium Inter-nacional Recursos para un Prácticum de Calidad. 5-7 Julio, Poio. Pontevedra, España. pp. 35-48. https://goo.gl/GUZKr8

Cebrián-Robles, D.; Pérez-Galán, R., & Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M., (2017). Estudio de la comunicación en la evaluación de los diarios de prácticas que favorecen la argumentación. Revista Prácticum, 2(1), 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/RevPracticumrep.v2i1.8262

Dickinson, P., & Adams, J., (2017). Values in evaluation–The use of rubrics. Evaluation and program planning. (65), 113-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.07.005

Fuks, H.; Raposo, A.; Gerosa, M.; Pimentel, M.; Filippo, D. e Lucena, C. (2011). Teorias e modelos de colaboração. In: Pimentel, M. e Fuks, H. Sistemas colaborativos. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier-Campus-SBC.

Gallego-Arrufat, M.J. & Dandis, M. (2014). Rubrics in a Secondary Mathematics Class. Mathematics Education, 9(1), 73-82.

Gallego-Arrufat, M.J. & Raposo-Rivas, M., (2014). Compromiso del estudiante y percep-ción del proceso evaluador basado en rúbricas. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universita-ria, 12(1), 197-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2014.6423

Gallego-Arrufat, M.J., Gámiz-Sánchez, V., & Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E. (2015). Tendencias en la evaluación del aprendizaje en cursos en línea masivos y abiertos. Educación XXI, 18(2), 77-96. doi: 10.5944/educxx1.12935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.12935

Lawson, T., Çakmak, M., Gündüz, M., & Busher, H. (2015). Research on teaching prac-ticum a systematic review. European journal of teacher education, 38(3), 392-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.994060

Martínez Figueira, E.; Tellado-González, F. y Raposo-Rivas, M.; (2013): La rúbrica como instrumento para la autoevaluación: un estudio piloto, Revista de Docencia Universita-ria vol 11 (n2), mayo-agosto, 373-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2013.5581

Sennett, R., (2009). El artesano. Barcelona: Anagrama.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-19

Dimensions

PlumX

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Experiencias

License

Acceptance of the work implies that the author grants Revista Prácticum the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute and sell his or her work worldwide, both in digital and paper formats, CD-ROM, etc.

Likewise, the authors shall grant Revista Prácticum the rights of dissemination, public communication on the Internet and IT networks, data buses, as well as any other portals or electronic devices for online consultation of its contents and extracts, under the conditions of the portal, repositories or databases where the work is stored.

Revista Prácticum allows authors to publish and disseminate their articles and works on their personal websites, research teams, institutional repositories and scientific databases. All this in accordance with the Creative Commons 4.0 License

How to Cite

Collaborative model of evaluation of learnings in the practicum through Corubric. (2018). Diario De Practicum, 3(1), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.24310/RevPracticumrep.v3i1.8275
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Most read articles by the same author(s)