Collaborative model of evaluation of learnings in the practicum through Corubric

Authors

  • Manuel Cebrián de la Serna University of Malaga image/svg+xml
    Spain
    Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24310/RevPracticumrep.v3i1.8275

Keywords:

Practicum, Alternative Assessment, Collaborative Assessment, Portfolio, Scoring Ru-brics, Video Annotation.

Abstract

In the last curricula the subjects of the Practicum and the External Practices hadan important increase in hours, both in those degrees that already had a trajectory and those for which they represented a new subject. In both cases, they are all involved in new issues, mainly caused by changes in the teaching and assessment of competency- based learning, students’ demands for more practical training related to the world of work, development and impact of technologies as the challenges that accompany them (preservation of identity, confidentiality contracts, repositories and copyright ...), among other important aspects. This paper presents a model based on collaboration where technologies have a relevant role, especially with the use of electronic rubrics and video annotations for tutoring and assessment of learning in the Practicum of the degree of Pedagogy. The model is described, the rubrics used and a list of advantages and requirements to apply the model, especially referred to Corubric.com, leaving for another time the analysis of Coannotation.com by the dimensions of this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Manuel Cebrián de la Serna, University of Malaga
    University of Malaga

References

Bartolomé Pina, A., Canto?n Mayo, I. & Moral Ferrer, J.M. (2017). Una revisio?n a los Prác-ticum de la educacio?n desde las tecnologías. Revista Prácticum, 1(1) 40-53.

Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. (2017). Recursos tecnológicos para un PLE-portafolios multi-media de calidad para el Prácticum y las prácticas externas. En XIV Symposium Inter-nacional Recursos para un Prácticum de Calidad. 5-7 Julio, Poio. Pontevedra, España. pp. 35-48. https://goo.gl/GUZKr8

Cebrián-Robles, D.; Pérez-Galán, R., & Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M., (2017). Estudio de la comunicación en la evaluación de los diarios de prácticas que favorecen la argumentación. Revista Prácticum, 2(1), 1-21.

Dickinson, P., & Adams, J., (2017). Values in evaluation–The use of rubrics. Evaluation and program planning. (65), 113-116.

Fuks, H.; Raposo, A.; Gerosa, M.; Pimentel, M.; Filippo, D. e Lucena, C. (2011). Teorias e modelos de colaboração. In: Pimentel, M. e Fuks, H. Sistemas colaborativos. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier-Campus-SBC.

Gallego-Arrufat, M.J. & Dandis, M. (2014). Rubrics in a Secondary Mathematics Class. Mathematics Education, 9(1), 73-82.

Gallego-Arrufat, M.J. & Raposo-Rivas, M., (2014). Compromiso del estudiante y percep-ción del proceso evaluador basado en rúbricas. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universita-ria, 12(1), 197-215.

Gallego-Arrufat, M.J., Gámiz-Sánchez, V., & Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E. (2015). Tendencias en la evaluación del aprendizaje en cursos en línea masivos y abiertos. Educación XXI, 18(2), 77-96. doi: 10.5944/educxx1.12935

Lawson, T., Çakmak, M., Gündüz, M., & Busher, H. (2015). Research on teaching prac-ticum a systematic review. European journal of teacher education, 38(3), 392-407.

Martínez Figueira, E.; Tellado-González, F. y Raposo-Rivas, M.; (2013): La rúbrica como instrumento para la autoevaluación: un estudio piloto, Revista de Docencia Universita-ria vol 11 (n2), mayo-agosto, 373-390.

Sennett, R., (2009). El artesano. Barcelona: Anagrama.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-19

Dimensions

PlumX

Citations

Issue

Section

Experiencias

How to Cite

Cebrián de la Serna, M. (2018). Collaborative model of evaluation of learnings in the practicum through Corubric. Diario De Practicum, 3(1), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.24310/RevPracticumrep.v3i1.8275

Most read articles by the same author(s)